Re: DIS: Proto: Chambers II

2008-07-11 Thread Ed Murphy
BobTHJ wrote: > Remove all but the last paragraph from R2196 The essential-parameters clause should be retained somewhere. You add chamber to R1607, but I think you drop AI. > Create a new rule titled "Chambers" with Power=3 and the following text: > {{ > A rule may define a chamber by specifyi

Re: DIS: Proto: Chambers II

2008-07-11 Thread Ed Murphy
ehird wrote: > No, like, what are Chambers? "Chamber" used to be the rule-defined name for "whether a proposal is ordinary or democratic".

Re: DIS: Proto: Chambers II

2008-07-11 Thread Elliott Hird
2008/7/11 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Elliott Hird > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 2008/7/11 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> Proposal: Chambers II >>> AI: 3 >>> II: 1 >> >> Cliff's Notes? >> > Allows more chambers to be created beyond the democratic and

Re: DIS: Proto: Chambers II

2008-07-11 Thread Roger Hicks
On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 4:27 PM, Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/7/11 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Proposal: Chambers II >> AI: 3 >> II: 1 > > Cliff's Notes? > Allows more chambers to be created beyond the democratic and the ordinary. Secondary proposals create a champions cha

Re: DIS: Proto: Chambers II

2008-07-11 Thread Elliott Hird
2008/7/11 Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Proposal: Chambers II > AI: 3 > II: 1 Cliff's Notes?

DIS: Proto: Chambers II

2008-07-11 Thread Roger Hicks
Proposal: Chambers II AI: 3 II: 1 { Remove all but the last paragraph from R2196 Create a new rule titled "Chambers" with Power=3 and the following text: {{ A rule may define a chamber by specifying: 1) The class of eligible voters on agoran decisions to adopt proposals within that chamber 2) T