On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 8:23 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just don't have time to grok the economy in fullness
i was working on a thesis on the topic but I gave up when the Bank of
Agora collapsed.
root wrote:
> I rather prefer the current decentralization of the economy, which
> lets us experiment with multiple models at once. If players want to
> use Chits as legal tender, they can. Players who have no interest in
> the economy can just ignore it. I don't see a reason that any of this
>
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 3:21 PM, Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I rather prefer the current decentralization of the economy, which
>> lets us experiment with multiple models at once. If players want to
>> use Chits as legal tender, they can. Players who have no interest in
>> the economy can j
> I rather prefer the current decentralization of the economy, which
> lets us experiment with multiple models at once. If players want to
> use Chits as legal tender, they can. Players who have no interest in
> the economy can just ignore it. I don't see a reason that any of this
> needs to be
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 11:27 AM, Olipro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So, here's some ideas I've been bouncing around in my head;
>
> 1) a Rule declaring the RBoA to be a legal entity and as such, becomes
> responsible for the value of the Chit, whilst at the same time, the Chit
> will forma
Hi,
So, here's some ideas I've been bouncing around in my head;
1) a Rule declaring the RBoA to be a legal entity and as such, becomes
responsible for the value of the Chit, whilst at the same time, the Chit
will formally become legal tender for settlement of all debts public and
private.
2) the
6 matches
Mail list logo
