Re: DIS: PRS

2008-12-01 Thread Ed Murphy
Wooble wrote: > On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Someone remind me again why we have point award limits and fixed >> points if the PRS is around? > > Because BobTHJ wanted to expend the much greater effort involved in > scamming the PRS into existence rather tha

Re: DIS: PRS

2008-12-01 Thread Alex Smith
On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 16:08 -0500, comex wrote: > On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Someone remind me again why we have point award limits and fixed > > points if the PRS is around? > > Mainly because amending contest rules requires AI=2, but contestifying > some

Re: DIS: PRS

2008-12-01 Thread comex
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Someone remind me again why we have point award limits and fixed > points if the PRS is around? Mainly because amending contest rules requires AI=2, but contestifying something didn't. I think.

Re: DIS: PRS

2008-12-01 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Someone remind me again why we have point award limits and fixed > points if the PRS is around? Because BobTHJ wanted to expend the much greater effort involved in scamming the PRS into existence rather than just proposing changing

DIS: PRS

2008-12-01 Thread Taral
Someone remind me again why we have point award limits and fixed points if the PRS is around? -- Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you." -- Unknown