Re: DIS: On office elections

2011-04-28 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Tanner Swett wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Tanner Swett wrote: > >> I disagree with that last point. I was a candidate in the recent > >> Scorekeepor election, and at the moment, I don't know if I won or not. > >> It w

Re: DIS: On office elections

2011-04-28 Thread Tanner Swett
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 12:02 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Tanner Swett wrote: >> I disagree with that last point. I was a candidate in the recent >> Scorekeepor election, and at the moment, I don't know if I won or not. >> It would have been better for the game (and my reputation

Re: DIS: On office elections

2011-04-28 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 28 Apr 2011, Tanner Swett wrote: > On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Elliott Hird > wrote: > > On 18 April 2011 03:06, Quazie wrote: > >> replace candidate with first-class candidate and i think its right. > >> > >> The president is much harder to get to vote. > > > > Good. It'd be a te

Re: DIS: On office elections

2011-04-28 Thread Tanner Swett
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 10:10 PM, Elliott Hird wrote: > On 18 April 2011 03:06, Quazie wrote: >> replace candidate with first-class candidate and i think its right. >> >> The president is much harder to get to vote. > > Good. It'd be a terrible recordkeeper. > > (But good point, it should default

Re: DIS: On office elections

2011-04-17 Thread Elliott Hird
On 18 April 2011 03:06, Quazie wrote: > replace candidate with first-class candidate and i think its right. > > The president is much harder to get to vote. Good. It'd be a terrible recordkeeper. (But good point, it should default to voting for that candidate if they don't vote themselves.)

Re: DIS: On office elections

2011-04-17 Thread Quazie
On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 6:34 PM, Elliott Hird wrote: > Proto: {A vote for a candidate is actually a vote to endorse that > candidate, unless cast by the candidate emself.} > > No point in forcing people into office if they'll just resign, and if > a candidate thinks another person is a better fit,

DIS: On office elections

2011-04-17 Thread Elliott Hird
Proto: {A vote for a candidate is actually a vote to endorse that candidate, unless cast by the candidate emself.} No point in forcing people into office if they'll just resign, and if a candidate thinks another person is a better fit, then it seems logical to redirect votes for them to that candi