Re: DIS: Notary discussion

2008-12-02 Thread comex
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 12:46 PM, Alex Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In theory, it's impossible to not inform the Notary for a public > contract, as changes have to be published. On the other hand, repeatedly > publishing diffs, rather than the whole contract can lead to all sorts > of trouble.

Re: DIS: Notary discussion

2008-12-02 Thread Alex Smith
On Tue, 2008-12-02 at 12:30 -0500, comex wrote: > We really need a Notary. I'm tired of having to search through old > reports-- Agora's stint with a web-accessible Notary site was highly > productive. > > I could take on the office but I'd rather not. Alternatively, I'm > contemplating initiati

Re: DIS: Notary discussion

2008-12-02 Thread Elliott Hird
On 2 Dec 2008, at 17:30, comex wrote: We really need a Notary. I'm tired of having to search through old reports-- Agora's stint with a web-accessible Notary site was highly productive. I will provide it to the next Notary. I could take on the office but I'd rather not. I nominate comex f

DIS: Notary discussion

2008-12-02 Thread comex
We really need a Notary. I'm tired of having to search through old reports-- Agora's stint with a web-accessible Notary site was highly productive. I could take on the office but I'd rather not. Alternatively, I'm contemplating initiating a set of criminal cases against the parties to some contr