On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 7:32 AM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The way I read the rules, Murphy CANNOT install comex, Pavitra, or
> woggle (since none of them have consented), so there's no waiting
> period in effect for the action of installing them.
So if one of them were to co
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 6:31 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I read "and consents" there as meaning I only SHALL do that if another
> > active player consents to eir nomination within the minimum waiting
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I read "and consents" there as meaning I only SHALL do that if another
> active player consents to eir nomination within the minimum waiting
> period. I have no intention of initiating an election.
Which is exactly w
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If, during the minimum waiting period between intent and action
> defined for Agoran Consent, another active player is nominated
> in this way and consents, then the IADoP SHALL as soon as
> possible in
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 3:24 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The IADoP is thus due to start
> > an Ambassador election in which BobTHJ is the only option.
>
> Run for your lives, Agorans! A one-option vote is ALW
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 3:16 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it's reasonable to interpret "during" as "not including the
> endpoints" in this situation. Still, the issue needs fixing.
>
> Proposal: No uncontested elections
> (AI = 2, II = 0, please)
>
> Amend Rule 2154 (Re
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 5:04 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The IADoP is thus due to start
> an Ambassador election in which BobTHJ is the only option.
Run for your lives, Agorans! A one-option vote is ALWAYS the start of
a coup! BobTHJ has by devious means tricked Agora into confi
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 2:55 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, this is an interesting situation. The way I read R2154, if
> multiple candidates were consent at this point, no election would be
> triggered. Instead, Murphy would simply have the option of installing
> whichev
On Mon, Apr 14, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 4/14/08, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I wrote on April 6:
> >
> > > I nominate BobTHJ, comex, Pavitra, and woggle for Ambassador.
> >
> > BobTHJ consented. Wooble supported, Zefram objected.
> >
> > Zefr
On 4/14/08, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wrote on April 6:
>
> > I nominate BobTHJ, comex, Pavitra, and woggle for Ambassador.
>
> BobTHJ consented. Wooble supported, Zefram objected.
>
> Zefram also supported woggle and objected to comex.
>
> Right now, I can't resolve any of thes
I wrote on April 6:
> I nominate BobTHJ, comex, Pavitra, and woggle for Ambassador.
BobTHJ consented. Wooble supported, Zefram objected.
Zefram also supported woggle and objected to comex.
Right now, I can't resolve any of these attempts. The time limit for
me to do so is April 20.
11 matches
Mail list logo
