Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Fwd: [s-b] The Monster has moved shop to B

2008-11-05 Thread Ed Murphy
ais523 wrote: > Wasn't proposal 5810 just a proposal to import the critical-mass rule > into B, though, given the circumstances? Proposal 5777 had already > passed, and I don't think Agorans would be likely to have missed its > significance. I've been approving Monster proposals due to significanc

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Fwd: [s-b] The Monster has moved shop to B

2008-11-05 Thread Alex Smith
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 12:42 -0800, Ed Murphy wrote: > Taral wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Elliott Hird > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Without 2 objections I intend to cause the Monster to repeal rules 2214, > >> 2192 and 2193. > > > > I object. > > I also object. Proposal 58

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Fwd: [s-b] The Monster has moved shop to B

2008-11-05 Thread Elliott Hird
On 5 Nov 2008, at 19:36, Alex Smith wrote: Why? This is basically just fixing a buggy proposal via Monster. It'll be fixed by proposal otherwise, but this way is faster. Agora nationalism? -- ehird

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Fwd: [s-b] The Monster has moved shop to B

2008-11-05 Thread Alex Smith
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 11:28 -0800, Taral wrote: > On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:48 AM, Elliott Hird > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Without 2 objections I intend to cause the Monster to repeal rules 2214, > > 2192 and 2193. > > I object. > Why? This is basically just fixing a buggy proposal via Monst

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Fwd: [s-b] The Monster has moved shop to B

2008-11-05 Thread Alex Smith
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 16:37 -0800, Charles Reiss wrote: > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 16:30, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Elliott Hird > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I repeal rules 2214, 2192 and 2193. > > > > This fails because you are not an instrument (see

Re: DIS: Fwd: [s-b] The Monster has moved shop to B

2008-11-04 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, comex wrote: > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> R2214 could be clearer, but it's reasonable to extrapolate that the >> rules are repealed by the effect of R2214. At least, that's how we've >> always done this sort of thing in the past. >

Re: DIS: Fwd: [s-b] The Monster has moved shop to B

2008-11-04 Thread Ian Kelly
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:46 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> R2214 could be clearer, but it's reasonable to extrapolate that the >> rules are repealed by the effect of R2214. At least, that's how we've >> always done thi

Re: DIS: Fwd: [s-b] The Monster has moved shop to B

2008-11-04 Thread Elliott Hird
On 5 Nov 2008, at 00:30, comex wrote: This fails because you are not an instrument (see Rule 105). Poop. One-off proposal, anyone? -- ehird

Re: DIS: Fwd: [s-b] The Monster has moved shop to B

2008-11-04 Thread comex
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:34 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > R2214 could be clearer, but it's reasonable to extrapolate that the > rules are repealed by the effect of R2214. At least, that's how we've > always done this sort of thing in the past. I swear there's a precedent (or at least

Re: DIS: Fwd: [s-b] The Monster has moved shop to B

2008-11-04 Thread Ian Kelly
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:30 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -- Forwarded message -- > From: comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:27 PM > Subject: Re: [s-b] The Monster has moved shop to B > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Elliott

DIS: Fwd: [s-b] The Monster has moved shop to B

2008-11-04 Thread comex
-- Forwarded message -- From: comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:27 PM Subject: Re: [s-b] The Monster has moved shop to B To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I repeal rules 2214, 2192 and 2193. This fa