On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 03:15 -0500, omd wrote:
> If so, I think there should probably be some way to trade PP more
> explicitly than spamming coauthorship (and proposals), which has a
> certain elegance but, at least in its current form, would be rather
> slow and uncertain. It could even be based
On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:51 AM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 02:47 -0500, omd wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Alex Smith
>> wrote:
>> > Proto "Promotion Points", AI 1:
>>
>> It might be nice to connect this to Organization Budgets somehow,
>> though I'm not sure what exac
On Wed, 2016-02-24 at 02:47 -0500, omd wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Alex Smith
> wrote:
> > Proto "Promotion Points", AI 1:
>
> It might be nice to connect this to Organization Budgets somehow,
> though I'm not sure what exactly that would look like.
In general, I prefer the product
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 6:52 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> Proto "Promotion Points", AI 1:
It might be nice to connect this to Organization Budgets somehow,
though I'm not sure what exactly that would look like.
Proto "Promotion Points", AI 1:
Create a new Power-1 rule "Promotion Points" with the following text:
{{{
The Scorekeepor is an office.
Promotion Points (PP for short) is a player switch, tracked by the
Scorekeepor, whose values are the nonnegative integers and whose
default value is 0. To "g
5 matches
Mail list logo
