Re: DIS: Draft ruling in CFJ 2193

2008-10-07 Thread Benjamin Schultz
On Oct 5, 2008, at 7:33 PM, Ed Murphy wrote: OscarMeyr wrote: As noted by Murphy in eir support of filing this CFJ, the ninny did not use this alternate registration for material gain, so Exile is overkill. I therefore DRAFT sentence the ninny to the CHOKEY for the maximum of 180 days. E di

Re: DIS: Draft ruling in CFJ 2193

2008-10-05 Thread Ed Murphy
OscarMeyr wrote: > As noted by Murphy in eir support of filing this CFJ, the ninny did > not use this alternate registration for material gain, so Exile is > overkill. I therefore DRAFT sentence the ninny to the CHOKEY for the > maximum of 180 days. E didn't use it for non-trivial muddling

Re: DIS: Draft ruling in CFJ 2193

2008-10-04 Thread Benjamin Schultz
On Oct 4, 2008, at 9:10 PM, Benjamin Schultz wrote: THIS IS A DRAFT -- improvements are welcome. Previous CFJs have found that Phill was an alias for tusho (now ehird): Self-note: The list in question is CFJs 2184 and 2185. Other relevant CFJs are listed as open. - Benjamin Schult

DIS: Draft ruling in CFJ 2193

2008-10-04 Thread Benjamin Schultz
THIS IS A DRAFT -- improvements are welcome. Previous CFJs have found that Phill was an alias for tusho (now ehird): This duplicate registration is a blatant violation of R2170. I DRAFT rule GUILTY. As noted by Murphy in eir support of filing this CFJ, the ninny did not use this alte