On Sep 21, 2008, at 1:41 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
2008/9/21 Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Please elaborate on how the technical issue makes Discharge
appropriate. E
had *some* way of communicating with the Agoran community, as
shown in the
e
2008/9/21 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> E could have agreed to a contract allowing you to publish a message
> on eir behalf for this purpose.
>
>
OK, true. But I seriously believe that getting his email working again would
be a bigger priority - if I had that problem I wouldn't think of that.
On Sunday 21 September 2008 12:41:25 Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> > 2008/9/21 Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> Please elaborate on how the technical issue makes Discharge appropriate.
> >> E had *some* way of communicating with the Agoran community, as
tusho wrote:
> 2008/9/21 Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Please elaborate on how the technical issue makes Discharge appropriate. E
>> had *some* way of communicating with the Agoran community, as shown in the
>> evidence.
>
> Timezones made that very difficult, and besides, even if e g
On Sun, 21 Sep 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> 2008/9/21 Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Please elaborate on how the technical issue makes Discharge appropriate. E
>> had *some* way of communicating with the Agoran community, as shown in the
>> evidence.
>
> Timezones made that very difficul
2008/9/21 Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Please elaborate on how the technical issue makes Discharge appropriate. E
> had *some* way of communicating with the Agoran community, as shown in the
> evidence.
Timezones made that very difficult, and besides, even if e gave me the
perogative
a
On Sunday 21 September 2008 10:06:10 am Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> On Sep 21, 2008, at 10:59 AM, Elliott Hird wrote:
> > DISCHARGE. He could not have assigned them.
>
> Please elaborate on how the technical issue makes Discharge
> appropriate. E had *some* way of communicating with the Agoran
> com
On Sep 21, 2008, at 10:59 AM, Elliott Hird wrote:
2008/9/21 Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Accordingly, a ruling of GUILTY is appropriate. I am uncertain
whether an
apology or a fine is appropriate. I'm leaning towards a proto-
ruling of
fine, and willing to drop it back to apology i
2008/9/21 Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Accordingly, a ruling of GUILTY is appropriate. I am uncertain whether an
> apology or a fine is appropriate. I'm leaning towards a proto-ruling of
> fine, and willing to drop it back to apology if the October prerogatives are
> assigned before I
THIS IS A DRAFT
The most recent Herald's Report that I have, dated 31 August 2008,
shows that the Prerogatives for August 2008 were not assigned by RH
Speaker pikhq. The evidence submitted by tusho shows that pikhq had
technical issues with email, but some Internet access.
Accordingly, a
10 matches
Mail list logo
