On Sep 16, 2016, at 12:29 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Should a basic definition be provided, or is that a dictionary but
> not belonging in a concordance and we should infer the definition?
> (not hard in this case of course).
I’d prefer to avoid that - I meant this as an aid to navigating the rule
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> With that in mind, how does this concordance for “Agora” (syn. “Agora Nomic”)
> read?
Should a basic definition be provided, or is that a dictionary but
not belonging in a concordance and we should infer the definition?
(not hard in this case of cou
> On Sep 15, 2016, at 12:35 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>> Has anyone written (and maintained, which is the real work) a
>> concordance for Agora’s rules, so that players can more easily
>> cross-reference terms?
>
> There have been a couple in the
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> Has anyone written (and maintained, which is the real work) a
> concordance for Agora’s rules, so that players can more easily
> cross-reference terms?
There have been a couple in the past, but maintenance didn't last
long and those are buried and
Hi,
From recent discussions, it sounds like at least a few folks are on board with
reorganizing the rules to put the privileges and responsibilities of each
office together wherever possible, and more generally to avoid spreading
clauses relating to a single subject across multiple rules.
Mean
5 matches
Mail list logo
