On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 12:34:21 +0200
Luis Ressel wrote:
> On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:03:52 +0100
> ais523 wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 23:46 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > A good first move in this situation might be to flip the spending
> > power of all offices Alexis holds (Referee, in this
On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 11:03:52 +0100
ais523 wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 23:46 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> A good first move in this situation might be to flip the spending
> power of all offices Alexis holds (Referee, in this case) to 0, thus
> making the proposal impossible to pend without ou
On Thu, 2016-10-20 at 23:46 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> And why would anyone vote for this? What's the loophole you're using? I
> assume we have to wait and see, but unless you have a loophole... Stoping
> this from working may require CFJs, but the damage can be minimized even if
> it passes...
3 matches
Mail list logo