Agora might be a cooperative, along with the many other things it is.
-o
> On Feb 9, 2019, at 11:31 PM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>
> I’ve always thought of Agora as more of a non-profit corporation, although
> I guess it’s currently an unincorporated association. Walruses were an
> asset once, w
On Monday, February 11, 2019 6:56 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Agora has 1,000+ coins, and attempts to transfer coins "to the Ruleset (as a
> contract)" would either transfer the coin to Agora, or attempt to transfer
> to a nonexistent entity (leading to the question being malformed).
Don't suppose I
> On Feb 11, 2019, at 1:56 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> The current Contract definition is here in R1742:
> > Any group of two or more consenting persons (the parties) may
> > make an agreement among themselves with the intention that it be
> > binding upon them and be governed by
Judgement Protos:
CFJ: "The Ruleset (as a contract) now has 1 coin."
Agreements are things people naturally make, as part of being social
animals. A game is generally a natural, social agreement to abide by a
specific set of rules for a time. Agora is, by common definition and
natural pract
I am very skeptical that R869 is broken, but I’ll be interested to hear
your ruling.
-Aris
On Sun, Feb 10, 2019 at 6:05 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> If no one has favored these CFJs, I do so.
>
> When D. Margaux explained eir scam to me privately at the beginning of the
> week, we had an interesti
I’ve always thought of Agora as more of a non-profit corporation, although
I guess it’s currently an unincorporated association. Walruses were an
asset once, weren’t they... I seem to recall reading an old CFJ that
mentioned them once.
-Aris
On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 4:32 PM David Nicol wrote:
> I
On Sat, 9 Feb 2019, Cuddle Beam wrote:
- You can change the rules if everyone agrees to it, without needing a
proposal for it. R1742: "A contract may be modified, including by changing
the set of parties, by agreement between all existing parties."
That rule has too low power to trump the safe
I've always thought that Agora -- should it wish to grow a commercial
pseudopod -- would make sense as an independent dispute resolution venue,
for real world contracts. This would amount to essentially hanging out a
shingle as an arbitration service. Prerequisite of course would be allowing
for su
The proposal that put our current contact system into place said “destroy all
contracts.” Luckily, it was before the rule defined “contract” was created, so
it’s probably fine. (Also, our safeguards probably would have cleaned things up)
Gaelan
> On Feb 9, 2019, at 10:36 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
Yeah, it’s hard to argue that they aren’t a contract. There have been times
in the past when that’s been explicitly specified (well, at least that
they’re construed as if they’re a contract between the players).
-Aris
On Sat, Feb 9, 2019 at 9:44 AM Reuben Staley
wrote:
> Upon my first reading,
Actually, the CFJ I submitted was not to the public forum, so it doesn't
count. But you seem to have covered it up pretty well, so I won't resubmit.
On 2/9/19 11:36 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
I submit the following CFJ, and I suggest the same Judge to be assigned to
both (it's trivially False if Tr
Upon my first reading, this didn't surprise me that much. It makes sense
that these systems would look similar because AFAIK Contracts were
actually modeled after the rules. However, then I realized that CFJ 3664
where G. and D. Margaux informally agreed to do something but because it
satisfied
12 matches
Mail list logo
