Gratuitous arguments:
1. By this logic, I could claim that any event in the game - for example,
this CFJ being judged FALSE, or my own failure to win the game -
constitutes a penalty worse than losing and so cannot be imposed.
2. Even accepting that the loss of the game is a humiliation worse tha
On 28/06/2013 1:07 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
I call for judgement on the following: what is above described as
proposal 364 is actually a proposal.
Argument: I find the notion of this proposal to be extremely
humiliating. It unfairly awards the game to old-timers, despite the
hard work of the mo
On 28/06/2013 9:58 AM, Alexander Smith wrote:
It looks like I was too early with my last attempts to vote, so I again attempt
to vote:
363 FOR
364 FOR
It was not too early, voting started when I distributed, not when I
posted the report. And, you voted against before.
H. Speaker Fool, I
My block of proposals earned 260 points for me. Half of that is 130.
There was only one entrant to the scavenger hunt, Steve.
Steve performed with a high degree of research skill. E found
sources for all 10 answers. E didn't get a perfect score (i.e. e
didn't list every awardee in every rule)
On Fri, 28 Jun 2013, Alexander Smith wrote:
> It looks like I was too early with my last attempts to vote, so I again
> attempt to vote:
>
> 363 FOR
> 364 FOR
>
> H. Speaker Fool, I also would like to point out that I believe I
> gained 40 points from each of 358, 359, 360. (These presumably
It looks like I was too early with my last attempts to vote, so I again attempt
to vote:
363 FOR
364 FOR
H. Speaker Fool, I also would like to point out that I believe I gained 40
points from each of 358, 359, 360. (These presumably weren't on the lists that
Goethe sent you because I wasn't a
I cast an extra vote for 343.
7 matches
Mail list logo
