On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Followup:
>
> One important thing to consider is the difference between:
> "I do X. It may not work."
> which disclaims the ability to X but not the attempt, versus:
> "I may nor may not do X"
> which disclaims the attempt/assertion that one i
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 4:27 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Looking through all this, I think disclaimers should have no direct legal
> effect other than to alert people that something might be wrong. Then, if
> a truthiness case is brought, an "honest" disclaimer about minor uncertainty
> (or truly di
On 08/16/2010 02:27 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, omd wrote:
So, what sort of disclaimers work?
Looking through all this, I think disclaimers should have no direct legal
effect other than to alert people that something might be wrong. Then, if
a truthiness case is brought, an "h
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, omd wrote:
> > So, what sort of disclaimers work?
>
> Looking through all this, I think disclaimers should have no direct legal
> effect other than to alert people that something might be wrong. Then, if
> a truthiness case is bro
On Mon, 16 Aug 2010, omd wrote:
> So, what sort of disclaimers work?
Looking through all this, I think disclaimers should have no direct legal
effect other than to alert people that something might be wrong. Then, if
a truthiness case is brought, an "honest" disclaimer about minor uncertaint
So, what sort of disclaimers work? The judgements of CFJs 1935, 1971,
and 2227 imply that they can come after a message without trouble, and
CFJ 1971 in particular that an excessively disclaimered message fails
to provide any substantive information and so fails to take some
actions; but here is a
6 matches
Mail list logo
