On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 06:29:40PM -0500, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 1/29/21 12:42 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
> > Miscellaneous comments and thoughts:
> >
> > * I think someone could get around the current proto by creating a new
> > locker every couple of days.
>
On 1/29/21 12:42 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
> Miscellaneous comments and thoughts:
>
> * I think someone could get around the current proto by creating a new
> locker every couple of days.
They wouldn't be able to transfer assets to it until they set an executor.
> * Another wo
On Fri, Jan 29, 2021 at 10:15:58AM -0500, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 1/28/21 10:50 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 08:53:55PM -0500, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
> > wrote:
> >> This is intended to prevent lockers from being excluded from
>
On 1/28/21 10:50 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 08:53:55PM -0500, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>> This is intended to prevent lockers from being excluded from
>> rules-defined theft (which I plan to propose stones for soon(tm)). The
>> intended purp
On Tue, Jan 26, 2021 at 08:53:55PM -0500, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> This is intended to prevent lockers from being excluded from
> rules-defined theft (which I plan to propose stones for soon(tm)). The
> intended purpose of this is to allow stones to mess with assets without
> incent
Notes inline, followed by some general thoughts
> On Jan 26, 2021, at 5:54 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
> This is intended to prevent lockers from being excluded from
> rules-defined theft (which I plan to propose stones for soon(tm)). The
> intended purpose of this is to all
On 1/26/21 11:45 PM, JTAC via agora-discussion wrote:
> On 27/1/2021 12:29 pm, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
>> It would revert to the default value of "null".
>>
>> Rule 2162:
>>
>>> If an
>>> instance of a switch would otherwise fail to have a possible
>>> value, it comes to
On 27/1/2021 12:29 pm, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> It would revert to the default value of "null".
>
> Rule 2162:
>
>> If an
>> instance of a switch would otherwise fail to have a possible
>> value, it comes to have its default value.
>
Yes, I skipped over that bit. My
On 1/26/21 11:26 PM, JTAC via agora-discussion wrote:
> EDIT: I meant the scenario where an executor is no longer a party of the
> contract in my last comment.
>
>
It would revert to the default value of "null".
Rule 2162:
> If an
> instance of a switch would otherwise fail to have a possi
EDIT: I meant the scenario where an executor is no longer a party of the
contract in my last comment.
--
JTAC
Referee
On 27/1/2021 9:53 am, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> {
>
> Executor is a contract switch with possible values of every party that
> is a player, Agora, and null, defaulting to null, tracked by the Notary.
> Assets CANNOT be transferred to a contract with null executor.
>
> A party to th
This is intended to prevent lockers from being excluded from
rules-defined theft (which I plan to propose stones for soon(tm)). The
intended purpose of this is to allow stones to mess with assets without
incentivizing lockers (which would ruin Trigon's life).
Key design goals:
1. Each contract ha
12 matches
Mail list logo
