Huh. I agree that our usual Agoran method of interpretation would be
(most likely) to treat this literally (i.e. broken).
On Sun, 23 Sep 2018, D Margaux wrote:
> I noticed an issue with the Points proposal.
>
> >> For a player to 'lose' a point is for it to be destroyed (if e has one).
>
>
I noticed an issue with the Points proposal.
>> For a player to 'lose' a point is for it to be destroyed (if e has one).
There’s a possible bug here. It should say “if e has any,” otherwise (taken
literally) a player can lose points only when e has a single point left
(“one”).
On Sun, Sep 23,
This is the draft for all of the old proposals that have been re-added
after they failed quorum. Comments and corrections are, as always,
appreciated.
-Aris
---
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating the Agoran
Decision of whether to adopt it, and removing it from the proposal
pool
3 matches
Mail list logo
