On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> I don't see how those players not listed can be considered watchers.
> They didn't even respond to an email I sent asking if they are
> watching the game.
Proposal 5211, to remove people not paying attention from the Watchers
list, failed ho
2009/5/1 Aaron Goldfein :
> I don't see how those players not listed can be considered watchers.
> They didn't even respond to an email I sent asking if they are
> watching the game. And Wooble, if you do become registrar and do
> decide to list those players who did not respond to the email, that
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 12:16 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Elliott Hird
> wrote:
>> Incomplete watchers list :(
>
> Well, it's based on the last Registrar's Report. I'd be happy to
> reconstruct the list from the old one.
>
I don't see how those players not listed
On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> Incomplete watchers list :(
Well, it's based on the last Registrar's Report. I'd be happy to
reconstruct the list from the old one.
Incomplete watchers list :(
2009/5/1 Geoffrey Spear :
> Were I the registrar, I would publish the following:
>
> Registrar's Census
>
> Date of last report: Wed 29 Apr 09
> Date of this report: Fru 1 May 09
>
> Date of last ratification: Fri 4 Jul 08
> Date of report last ratified: Sun 29 Jun 08
>
Were I the registrar, I would publish the following:
Registrar's Census
Date of last report: Wed 29 Apr 09
Date of this report: Fru 1 May 09
Date of last ratification: Fri 4 Jul 08
Date of report last ratified: Sun 29 Jun 08
(All times are UTC)
Recent events
-
Wed 22 Apr 10:34-
I don't publish the following. If elected, I might publish it.
(Non-)Conductor's Lead Sheet
Date of this (non-)report: Mon 22 Dec 2008
Date of last report: Sun 14 Dec 2008
Date of last manual ratification : Tue 22 Jan 2008
Date of report last manually ratified: Fri 18 Jan 2008
(All time
7 matches
Mail list logo