On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 9:19 AM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/23/08, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I call for judgement on the following:
>> * It is possible for ehird to cause woggle to vote by announcing 'On behalf
>> of woggle: woggle retracts eir votes on proposal 5568
2008/6/23 comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Oh, my... It really ought not to be possible to continually exploit
> the same paradox to get a win.
>
I guess woggle should be Plagiarist too.
ehird
On 6/23/08, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I call for judgement on the following:
> * It is possible for ehird to cause woggle to vote by announcing 'On behalf
> of woggle: woggle retracts eir votes on proposal 5568 and votes AGAINST x 6
> on proposal 5568'.
> ~~
Oh, my... It really ou
On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 11:53 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 22, 2008 at 10:48 PM, Chester Mealer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'm about to be busy and ehird gave me an idea.
>>
> [...]
>
>>
>> 8. Any party with support of a majority of trustees and without obje
4 matches
Mail list logo
