Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Unanimity issue

2007-01-14 Thread Michael Norrish
Michael Slone wrote: On 1/12/07, Michael Norrish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Do I need to care? It depends on whether you want to submit ballots or just talk about it. See rule 683 (b): (b) The ballot clearly identifies the matter to be decided. You have not clearly identified anything

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Unanimity issue

2007-01-12 Thread Zefram
Michael Slone wrote: >You have not clearly identified anything except your intent to vote >AGAINST things. It seemed pretty clear to me. E unambiguously specified which things e was voting AGAINST. -zefram

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Unanimity issue

2007-01-12 Thread Michael Slone
On 1/12/07, Michael Norrish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Do I need to care? It depends on whether you want to submit ballots or just talk about it. See rule 683 (b): (b) The ballot clearly identifies the matter to be decided. You have not clearly identified anything except your intent to

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Unanimity issue

2007-01-11 Thread Michael Norrish
> On 1/11/07, Michael Norrish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I hereby vote AGAINST all proposals currently up for vote. > > Which ones are those? Do I need to care? Michael.

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Unanimity issue

2007-01-11 Thread Michael Slone
On 1/11/07, Michael Norrish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I hereby vote AGAINST all proposals currently up for vote. Which ones are those? -- Michael Slone