On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 18:05 -0400, ihope wrote:
> But I might as well be more specific. It's inappropriate on CFJs 1980
> and 1982 because paradox escalation, being bad for the game, is
> prevented by rule 217.
Paradox escalation isn't bad for the game, because we have a CFJ
judgement of UNDECIDABL
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/9/16 ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> It is sometimes appropriate.
>>
>> --Ivan Hope CXXVII
>>
>
> Alright. So... why did you say it wasn't? :P
Because I believed it was never appropriate at the time.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
2008/9/16 ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> It is sometimes appropriate.
>
> --Ivan Hope CXXVII
>
Alright. So... why did you say it wasn't? :P
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/9/16 ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> No longer necessary, as CFJ 2107 is done.
>>
>> --Ivan Hope CXXVII
>>
>
> And? I would still like an answer.
It is sometimes appropriate.
--Ivan Hope CXXVII
2008/9/16 ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> No longer necessary, as CFJ 2107 is done.
>
> --Ivan Hope CXXVII
>
And? I would still like an answer.
5 matches
Mail list logo
