On Mon, 27 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
You can either deny it or publish a revision. You should do neither,
but note that you will eventually have to choose one if the cfj isn't
judged w/in the next 7 days, which it won't be.
No, point 2.3 of rule 2201 allows em to cite an already existing CFJ.
A doubt is an explicit public challenge via one of the following
methods, identifying a document and explaining the scope and
nature of a perceived error in it:
1. An inquiry case, appropriate for questions of legal
interpretation.
2. A claim o
You can either deny it or publish a revision. You should do neither,
but note that you will eventually have to choose one if the cfj isn't
judged w/in the next 7 days, which it won't be.
On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 1:20 PM, Telnaior wrote:
> I'm pretty sure I have to respond to this by saying this Co
3 matches
Mail list logo
