Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting Limits and Credits Report

2007-10-01 Thread Benjamin Schultz
On Sep 30, 2007, at 1:24 PM, Ian Kelly wrote: On 9/30/07, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I believe "< 23 Jan 96 - 24 Sep 07" would be most accurate. I think the 15 July 2000 - 24 Sep 2007 registration is ALSO correct, due to the Annabel project (scam? goof?). How is that? Ann

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting Limits and Credits Report

2007-09-30 Thread Ian Kelly
On 9/30/07, Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I believe "< 23 Jan 96 - 24 Sep 07" would be most accurate. > > I think the 15 July 2000 - 24 Sep 2007 registration is ALSO correct, > due to the Annabel project (scam? goof?). How is that? Annabel was Maud's creation, not Murphy's. -ro

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting Limits and Credits Report

2007-09-30 Thread Benjamin Schultz
On Sep 26, 2007, at 1:10 AM, Ed Murphy wrote: root wrote: By the way, Murphy, could you please clear up your registration history for me? The registrar's report currently lists the following entries for you: Murphy 28 Jan 96 97 v Murphy

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting Limits and Credits Report

2007-09-25 Thread Ed Murphy
root wrote: On 9/23/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: My secondary reason for deregistering was to let First Speaker Michael keep the record for longest continuous registration. By the way, Murphy, could you please clear up your registration history for me? The registrar's report curr

Re: BUS: Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Voting Limits and Credits Report

2007-09-25 Thread Ian Kelly
On 9/23/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My > secondary reason for deregistering was to let First Speaker Michael > keep the record for longest continuous registration. By the way, Murphy, could you please clear up your registration history for me? The registrar's report currently lists