On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 23:50:33 +0100
ais523 wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-10-22 at 12:10 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Other note: A fair thing to do would be to hold an election. But
> > election for ADoP is resolved by ADoP - a problem! We actually
> > used to have "separation of powers" for this, s
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 3:50 PM, ais523 > wrote:
>
> This kind-of implies it should be the Promotor who resolves an ADoP
> election, except that that doesn't really make logical sense. Perhaps
> it should be resolved by the Assessor (who's already used to resolving
> elections), or by the Prime Mi
On Sat, 2016-10-22 at 12:10 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Other note: A fair thing to do would be to hold an election. But
> election for ADoP is resolved by ADoP - a problem! We actually
> used to have "separation of powers" for this, something that read:
>
> "In the case that the election is
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Saturday, October 22, 2016, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> I think we just call it "converging the gamestate" (very much not new to
> Alexis. Here you go.
>
> Maybe we don't need a new term, but I was talking about the specific case
> where
On Saturday, October 22, 2016, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> I think we just call it "converging the gamestate" (very much not new to
> Alexis. Here you go.
>
Maybe we don't need a new term, but I was talking about the specific case
where the person in an office was unclear.
-Aris
5 matches
Mail list logo
