comex wrote:
On Tuesday 19 June 2007, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Zefram wrote:
comex wrote:
I issue a Timing Order to the CotC to recuse the judge of CFJ 1684
ASAP (per R408).
I also issue a Timing Order to the CotC to recuse the judge of CFJ
1684 ASAP (per R408).
vii. Every person has the r
root wrote:
> It seems to me that performing the action would satisfy one of the
> orders, but the target could still be penalized at most once for not
> satisfying the remaining orders. If so, this is obviously broken.
Actually, here's a counterargument to it being broken (Rule 1794/8)(d):
On 6/19/07, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
comex wrote:
> So is taking the action for me a penalization?
It might be, but I meant the punishment if you didn't follow the
order (e.g. multiple timing orders to do the same thing result
in at most one penalty for not performing the task).
comex wrote:
> So is taking the action for me a penalization?
It might be, but I meant the punishment if you didn't follow the
order (e.g. multiple timing orders to do the same thing result
in at most one penalty for not performing the task).
It's quite possible that the subsequent orders are i
On Tuesday 19 June 2007, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Zefram wrote:
> > comex wrote:
> > > I issue a Timing Order to the CotC to recuse the judge of CFJ 1684
> > > ASAP (per R408).
> >
> > I also issue a Timing Order to the CotC to recuse the judge of CFJ
> > 1684 ASAP (per R408).
>
>vii. Every per
Zefram wrote:
> comex wrote:
> > I issue a Timing Order to the CotC to recuse the judge of CFJ 1684 ASAP
> > (per R408).
>
> I also issue a Timing Order to the CotC to recuse the judge of CFJ 1684
> ASAP (per R408).
vii. Every person has the right to not be penalized more than
6 matches
Mail list logo
