On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 at 21:06, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion
wrote:
> On 6/8/20 4:51 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> > 1 seems unconvincing. The NAX now requires simple majority for
> > amendments (meaning not all members need to publicly consent to the next
> > change), and I think everyone
On 6/8/20 4:51 PM, nch via agora-discussion wrote:
> 1 seems unconvincing. The NAX now requires simple majority for
> amendments (meaning not all members need to publicly consent to the next
> change), and I think everyone would accept that that mechanism works
> because all members consented to
On 6/8/20 2:37 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
> Rule 1742 reads: "A contract may be modified, including by changing the
> set of parties, with the consent of all existing parties."
>
> I don't believe CuddleBeam has consented to the amendment of this contract:
>
> 1. E has not publicly st
Gratuitous: the term "scam" isn't defined anywhere in the rules, nor in
this contract. CuddleBeam can claim eir contract has fewer scams all e
wants, but it won't change the text of the contract. FALSE, or possibly
IRRELEVANT.
On 6/8/2020 2:23 PM, James Cook via agora-business wrote:
On Mon,
4 matches
Mail list logo
