69, "How to Join and Leave Agora"), but we'd have
to call a CFJ on whether or not a banana capable of using email and
other computing facilities should be a person. :-)
God bless,
The Grey Knight
[ greyfire island ] :: http://www.greyfire.org
_
--- Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/31/07, Grey Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Due to a technical error, my first Notice of Rotation was
> ineffective.
> > The assignments of CFJs 1607, 1608, and 1609, as well as the second
> > Notice of Ro
Am I expected to keep http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/ up-to-date as
an unofficial part of the job, or does the site's owner do that?
God bless,
The Grey Knight
[ greyfire island ] :: http://www.greyfir
You wouldn't be the same Cctoide I know from #nethack, by any chance?
Small world!
God bless,
The Grey Knight
[ greyfire island ] :: http://www.greyfire.org
Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about th
job as zefram's proposal, but without introducing
the concept of transfinite numbers into the ruleset (IMHO a bit
simpler). It also guards against somebody giving a proposal with
AI=Aleph-1, which is currently permissible!
God bless,
The Grey Knight
[ gr
eople to comment
on before submitting the proposal. We can always amend the
arms-defining rule later if people are still dissatisfied with it.
God bless,
The Grey Knight
[ greyfire island ] :: http://www.greyfire.org
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?
--- Manuel Lanctot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/21/06, Ed Murphy wrote:
> >
> > [Agora logo]
>
> Thanks! I've added it to the wiki.
>
Here is a question: should the nature of the logo be specified in the
rules? I'm thinking "yes", personall
nt. Shall we dance?
God bless,
The Grey Knight
[ greyfire island ] :: http://www.greyfire.org
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
eriment with exercises in paradox without being overly worried about
bringing Agora crashing down around us. :-) I would support a sub-nomic
with a set of rules which is reset to a defined core after each win, or
something to that effect.
God bless,
The Grey Knight
[ greyfire is
he wrong way around. Consider:
> CFJ 1589: Quazie is inactive.
> Arguments: [...] Then, by this ruling, Quazie will be inactive (so
CFJ 1589 is FALSE).
I must've gotten the statement inverted in my head by the time
--- Benjamin Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 9, 2006, at 12:15 PM, Grey Knight wrote:
> >> No.| Title | By| AI | Date| Flag
> >> 4874 | The Final Word| Goethe| 4 | 26Oct06 | D
> >
> > I vote AGAINST.
> No.| Title | By| AI | Date| Flag
> 4874 | The Final Word| Goethe| 4 | 26Oct06 | D
>
I vote AGAINST.
God bless,
The Grey Knight
[ greyfire island ] :: http://www.gre
--- Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/8/06, Michael Slone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 08, 2006 at 02:42:22AM -0700, Grey Knight wrote:
> > > Rule 698/14 (Power=1) says "A player who is inactive or unready
> is
> > > inelig
--- Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/8/06, Grey Knight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Rule 698/14 (Power=1) says "A player who is inactive or unready is
> > ineligible to judge CFJs", so this would additionally mean that CFJ
> > 1590 is FALSE.
be inactive (so CFJ 1589 is FALSE).
Rule 698/14 (Power=1) says "A player who is inactive or unready is
ineligible to judge CFJs", so this would additionally mean that CFJ
1590 is FALSE.
(That rule quote is taken from the September SLR, but I can't see
anywhere where that rule has be
AI: 1
> Result: ADOPTED
>
> 4970: FOR: root, Maud
> AGAINST: Goethe, OscarMeyr
> PRESENT: Eris, Sherlock
> VI: 1
> AI: 2
> RESULT: FAILED
>
I voted on these too. Did I do something wrong?
16 matches
Mail list logo
