On 8/29/2022 12:11 PM, Forest Sweeney via agora-discussion wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2022, 9:19 AM ais523 via agora-discussion <
> agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 2022-08-28 at 22:16 -0700, Forest Sweeney via agora-business
>> wrote:
>>> As I'm kinda bullying everyone, I thou
On 8/29/22 13:23, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion wrote:
> We now have a player who is directly responsible for three FAGEs. I
> believe that it's time we discuss a mechanism similar to the one below.
Correction on this: directly responsible for one successful FAGE and one
attempted FAGE that fai
On 8/29/2022 2:28 PM, juan via agora-discussion wrote:
> I'll argue the following in principle. My only assumption is that there
> has been an injustice commited by some member of our community against
> another one.
To keep this a brief and neutral explanation, this happened in the Discord
foru
Jason Cobb via agora-discussion [2022-08-29 13:23]:
> We now have a player who is directly responsible for three FAGEs. I
> believe that it's time we discuss a mechanism similar to the one below.
>
>
> Title: Unfortunately
> Author: Jason
> Coauthors:
> Adoption index: 3.0
>
> {
>
> Amend Rule
I don't understand how one would work around it, but mainly, I think it
codifies the intent that we shouldn't be bullying voters. However, the only
reasons I had heard against it thus far was that it promotes interesting
gameplay, which I disagree with, but I thank you for a different angle on
this
We now have a player who is directly responsible for three FAGEs. I
believe that it's time we discuss a mechanism similar to the one below.
Title: Unfortunately
Author: Jason
Coauthors:
Adoption index: 3.0
{
Amend Rule 869 by appending the following paragraph:
{
Banned is a secured negative bo
> --
> nix
> Collector, Herald, Registrar, Webmastor
>
I will add some notes on how to use the scripts for my offices to their
repos later this week, to ease transitions. If you take an office I had
and want some help with it, let me know.
On Sun, 2022-08-28 at 22:16 -0700, Forest Sweeney via agora-business
wrote:
> As I'm kinda bullying everyone, I thought it would be appropriate if
> anything passes that I have some sort of penalty also. This sorta
> thing really shouldn't be allowed, though.
I think the easiest way to prevent thi
8 matches
Mail list logo
