Here's the ordinary draft.
-Aris
---
PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW
I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating a referendum on it,
and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote collector
is the Assessor, the quorum is 5, the voting method is AI-majority, and the
Here's a draft to fix some numbering problems; more details within.
-Aris
---
It has come to my attention that there are two Proposal 8495s. I will correct
this by assigning each a new ID number that unambiguously refers to only it
It is not my intent to invalidate the old ID numbers where they d
Incidentally, I think the below is more than enough detail to satisfy
Reportor duties for the Agoran Press --- so if you can see yourself
writing something like the below and want 5 Coins, sign up for a week.
This week (2020-09-15..21) is my off-week as Reportor, so you can simply
join the Agoran
> "It's not me. Based on info I suspect Falsifian or English Team. -G."
>
> SHA-256 Hash:
> 2b6e3546b748a65531ceae83d69b41c59b4b809dbb4ee9fce4ccfdf3b7f69345
> --
>
> I expunge 2 blots from myself.
>
> -G.
It wasn't me either.
--
Falsifian
On 9/15/2020 12:41 PM, Falsifian via agora-discussion wrote:
>> I support.
>>
>> I'll actually go the other direction. The contract says "Any player CAN,
>> with notice, file a proof of a claim of a valid judgement." With notice is
>> a mechanism; in the absence of something saying that the claim
> I support.
>
> I'll actually go the other direction. The contract says "Any player CAN,
> with notice, file a proof of a claim of a valid judgement." With notice is
> a mechanism; in the absence of something saying that the claim must be
> "specified", the only requirements are the requirements
6 matches
Mail list logo