On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 5:45 PM Alexis Hunt via agora-discussion
wrote:
>
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 at 19:05, Aris Merchant via agora-business <
> agora-busin...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 1:28 PM Kerim Aydin via agora-official
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > The below CFJ is 3792.
On 1/13/20 6:06 PM, Alexis Hunt via agora-business wrote:
> I initiate an election for Referee.
By what method?
--
Jason Cobb
On 1/13/2020 2:58 PM, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote:
>> You can't accurately match something that /doesn't yet exist to be
>> matched against/.
>
>
> Falsifian then said in a reply to the judgement [1]:
>
>> No objection to TRUE, but I don't think I understand this argument. If
>> the da
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 17:10, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> Alexis wrote:
> > The only difference is the expectation that the officer, before
> publishing
> > the report, verify that no messages have been sent that would alter the
> > contents o
Alexis wrote:
> The only difference is the expectation that the officer, before publishing
> the report, verify that no messages have been sent that would alter the
> contents of the report. I do not believe that this is an unreasonable
> expectation on an officer. Agora does not have the volume of
I bid 22 coins.
Gaelan
> On Jan 13, 2020, at 11:45 AM, Jason Cobb via agora-business
> wrote:
>
> On 1/12/20 5:31 PM, Gaelan Steele via agora-business wrote:
>> I bid 20 coins.
>>
>> Gaelan
>
> I bid 21 coins.
>
> --
> Jason Cobb
>
What if we set the maximum dynamically, such as by setting it to “no more than
50% of total voting strength.” That has the benefit of not needing constant
adjustment, and also serves as an anti-scam measure.
Gaealn
> On Jan 13, 2020, at 11:13 AM, Kerim Aydin via agora-discussion
> wrote:
>
>
On 1/13/2020 10:14 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> A third option to magnify its effect, beyond decreasing the default or
> increasing the maximum, would be to increase the strength of _everyone's_
> AGAINST votes.
Also kind of defeats the purpose of a sole-person's powerup.
Here's some outline I was thinking to move us towards a more pragmatic
model of law:
Any question that arises as part of a dispute can be categorized into one
of the following:
- Question of fact, divided into:
- Questions of natural fact, being facts which are true without reference
to the rul
Alexis wrote:
> It's still significant on a high-AI proposal, but I'd suggest that perhaps
> an alternative would be to decrease the default to 2? The Prime Minister is
> also affected by the default being 3.
The original justification for increasing the default to 3 was to prevent
a single unaggr
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 10:35, Jason Cobb via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> On 1/13/20 5:58 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> > I agree that it would be good to have some way of giving officers extra
> > votes on relevant proposals - this was also th
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 00:38, Gaelan Steele via agora-discussion <
agora-discussion@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> This doesn’t really do all that much—default voting strength is 3 and max
> is 5, so it’s a little under a double vote. Maybe we need to increase the
> range of allowed voting strengths?
>
On 1/13/20 5:58 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey via agora-discussion wrote:
> I agree that it would be good to have some way of giving officers extra
> votes on relevant proposals - this was also the goal of Trigon's
> "Interesting Chambers" proto - but I'm not sure that this system is
> workable in practice
Gaelan wrote:
> I create the following proposal: {
> Title: Bureaucratic Power
> AI: 2
> Author: Gaelan
>
> Create a power-2 rule titled “Bureaucrats” with the following text: {
> Each rule is said to have an “affinity” for each office, an integer equal to
> the sum of any points awarded by the fo
14 matches
Mail list logo
