On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 11:37 PM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> On 23 Oct 2019, 01:40, Ada Worcester < ag...@ada.pikhq.com> wrote:
> > I initiate a Call for Judgement into the following: {
> > The person known as ais523 is a player.
> > }
> >
> > I bar ais523 from this case.
>
> Oh great, this is pro
Okay, less soon than I’d really like, but I’ve done some work on it and
I’ll do more. There was really a glut of proposals this time around.
-Aris
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 5:45 PM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I’m aware this is late; expect an updated draft soon.
>
On 23 Oct 2019, 01:40, Ada Worcester < ag...@ada.pikhq.com> wrote:
> I initiate a Call for Judgement into the following: {
> The person known as ais523 is a player.
> }
>
> I bar ais523 from this case.
Oh great, this is probably going to get assigned to me, isn't it.
Quick straw poll: did anyone
On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 at 01:04, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 00:59 +, James Cook wrote:
> > I think it's pretty unclear.
> >
> > * Why should an attempt to do a players-only action indicate intent to
> > become a player anyway? If I were to say "I deregister ATMunn" (m
On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 00:59 +, James Cook wrote:
> I think it's pretty unclear.
>
> * Why should an attempt to do a players-only action indicate intent to
> become a player anyway? If I were to say "I deregister ATMunn" (my
> zombie), would you conclude that I intended, by publishing that
> me
I’m aware this is late; expect an updated draft soon.
-Aris
On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 11:09 PM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> A draft follows. I'm aware my ordering is... unconventional. It's for
> the befuddlement of future generations, and is all part of the fun.
>
On Tue, Oct 22, 2019, at 17:32, James Cook wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 at 21:39, Ada Worcester wrote:
> > I would prefer "pikhq", thanks for asking! (this is probably the easiest
> > for record keeping consistency, regardless :) )
> >
> > --
> > Ada "pikhq" Worcester, Agoran Spy
>
> Welcome, pi
On Tue, 2019-10-22 at 17:21 -0700, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> I had no idea that it was supposed to be a registration attempt until
> I saw others discussing it, so I think it’s a stretch to say it was
> reasonably {clear, ambiguous}.
I might actually buy an argument that it was unambiguous but unclea
I had no idea that it was supposed to be a registration attempt until I saw
others discussing it, so I think it’s a stretch to say it was reasonably
{clear, ambiguous}.
Gaelan
> On Oct 22, 2019, at 5:14 PM, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 00:06 +, James Cook wrote
On Wed, 2019-10-23 at 00:06 +, James Cook wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 at 00:02, ais...@alumni.bham.ac.uk
> wrote:
> > I also become a candidate. Election speech: Has anyone figured out
> > whether or not I'm a player yet?
> >
> As Registrar, I'm assuming you aren't.
>
> My reasoning: Your a
On Tue, 22 Oct 2019 at 05:03, Reuben Staley wrote:
> I resign Rulekeepor.
>
> As of this message, I will not be responding to any Agoran mail for
> approximately two years as I will be moving to a location where I will
> have very limited internet access. I am not deregistering. Rather, I
> submit
On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 at 21:40, Gaelan Steele wrote:
> Bleh.
>
> I note that holding a potentially-infinite number of offices would be an
> amusing punishment for lazy rule-writing, but conclude that it’s a little
> harsh. I retract my proposal and submit the following one:
The new proposal is id
On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 at 21:39, Ada Worcester wrote:
> I would prefer "pikhq", thanks for asking! (this is probably the easiest for
> record keeping consistency, regardless :) )
>
> --
> Ada "pikhq" Worcester, Agoran Spy
Welcome, pikhq!
--
- Falsifian
On Sun, 20 Oct 2019 at 14:54, Nch wrote:
> "Person Switch" is used in multiple rules, but not explicitly defined. This
> should probably be fixed, but it also sets a precedent for a common
> definition where X Switch is a switch all Xes have if X isn't a pre-defined
> type of switch. Does that
I feel the same way. Thank you, Trigon, for your diligent efforts as Rulekeepor
and Cartographor over the past few years.
Whatever's happening, please know that you will be missed and that, I'm sure,
you'll be gladly welcomed back whenever and if ever you decide to return.
-twg
‐‐‐ Origin
Thanks for your service! Rulekeepor is challenging. Approximately two years...
some sort of service corps? Whatever it is, I wish you the best.
Original Message
On Oct 22, 2019, 12:03 AM, Reuben Staley wrote:
> I resign Rulekeepor.
>
> As of this message, I will not be respondi
16 matches
Mail list logo
