Also, even with the correct Rule number, I think the answer is
guaranteed to be TRUE, since the repeal of a Rule does not cause it to
cease to exist, it just causes it to cease to be a rule, its power to be
set to 0, and to relieve the Rulekeepor of the responsibility to
maintain it. As a furth
Ooh! Then I favour this CFJ!
Jason Cobb
On 7/15/19 10:36 PM, James Cook wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 at 02:29, Rebecca wrote:
CFJ: Rule 2157 exists.
It's 2517.
On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 at 02:29, Rebecca wrote:
> CFJ: Rule 2157 exists.
It's 2517.
Notice from the Assessor:
Due to the new system of evaluating proposals by program, all votes are
now public on GitHub. New distributions will be kept in a branch on the
assessor repo, and a pull request will be created for each batch of
proposals.
An example of a pull request is here:
http
On Mon, 2019-07-15 at 21:01 -0500, nch wrote:
> Conditionally AGAINST unless G. pledges to give me a black ribbon
> then FOR.
There's no point in trying to control what a dictatorship does using
pledges; the dictatorship would be strong enough to unilaterally negate
the pledges.
--
ais523
Whoops, this should have gone to the actual distribution.
Jason Cobb
On 7/15/19 8:26 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
CoE: Falsifian is the author of 8202 ("Police Power"), although e has
listed me as a co-author.
I assume everybody on the GitHub org got a message about me adding a key
to Assessor - that's me trying to set up CI for the Assessor repo.
Jason Cobb
On 7/12/19 9:29 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
I see that there is a GitHub organization for Agora. As of right now,
I've placed my assessor scripts at
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 2:21 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On 7/14/2019 7:56 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
> > I'm just curious on whether or not my reading of the Rules is correct
> here.
> > If I was to submit a proposal and specify the AI as something that needs
> to
> > be evaluated, say "the power of [s
8 matches
Mail list logo
