Well, we have some test cases right now, so someone could CFJ (if nobody
else does, I will later).
Jason Cobb
On 7/11/19 10:18 AM, James Cook wrote:
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 00:56, Rebecca wrote:
Does the CHoJ work now btw?
It's unclear, since R2557 may not give a method for levying fines. Se
On Wed, 10 Jul 2019 at 00:56, Rebecca wrote:
> Does the CHoJ work now btw?
It's unclear, since R2557 may not give a method for levying fines. See
my proposal "Police Power" with Jason Cobb.
Ah, my bad.
Gratuitous (or amending the arguments, whatever):
G. has pointed out that I'm wrong about the final paragraph of my
original arguments, so please disregard that paragraph.
Jason Cobb
On 7/11/19 9:50 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On 7/10/2019 5:11 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
I do note
On 7/10/2019 5:11 PM, Jason Cobb wrote:
I do note that Rule 2438 uses "qualifies" and "earns" somewhat
interchangeably, especially towards the end of the list (see R's
definition vs P's definition), which may muddy the waters somewhat.
"Qualified" and "earned" are actually used v
On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 5:27 PM Jason Cobb wrote:
> I point my finger at omd for failure to assign a judgement to CFJ 3752
> in a timely fashion.
Apologies; I forgot I was assigned to this one. I'll judge it tomorrow.
5 matches
Mail list logo
