DIS: Re: BUS: Intent to clean rules

This needs to be done after the intent fixing proposal passes, anyway, since rule changes are explicitly _not_ fixed and this won't be in the ruleset that is being ratified. Greetings, Ørjan. On Tue, 5 Mar 2019, James Cook wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 at 00:59, James Cook wrote: I intend to

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: Contest wrap-up

On Mon, 4 Mar 2019, Kerim Aydin wrote: Having achieved Agoran Consent', I do so. Consent' is the type of Consent that fails now, but willan on-succeed forewhen Proposal 8164 retrotakes pre-effect. I am not entirely sure this way of disclaiming doesn't cause it to wioll haven broke, since you

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 8165-8173

Sorry. I did see your original comment but completely forgot to get around to writing a revised proposal. -twg Original Message On 4 Mar 2019, 02:18, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > This is broken. As I pointed out in a previous comment on this proposal, > rule [2591](tel:2591) no lon