Thanks, D. Margaux. The only thing I can think of is that "declaring"
might not be an action (and hence not covered by Rule 1728), or that
it might be synonymous with "announcing" or "publishing", which Rule
478 allows me to do. I'm guessing that Rule 217 and game custom
defeat those arguments, bu
I was unable to subscribe jc...@cs.berkeley.edu to the Agora lists (except
tue), but was able to subscribe falsifi...@gmail.com. Is this a common
problem?
It's not a problem for me (assuming you received this message) but thought
I'd mention it in case others are having trouble.
Sorry, I'd forgotten that deputy intents were entirely separate.
I agree it's trivial to get around, but requiring the naming of each
potential candidate still serves an informational purpose.
On 2/12/2019 1:49 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
Similar to the intent to demand resignation, this isn’t an i
Similar to the intent to demand resignation, this isn’t an intent with T
notice. It’s a separate procedure. See CFJ 3679. So the dependent action
standards do not apply.
Furthermore, this requirement would be trivially overcome if I simply announced
separate intents to deputise to name each p
Twg tried to win, but the consensus seems to be that e failed because the
intent was not published to a public forum (among other possible reasons).
> On Feb 12, 2019, at 4:23 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> Who even are the laureled players at this point? Has anyone attempted a win
> after my sc
Who even are the laureled players at this point? Has anyone attempted a win
after my scam? (Speaking of which, H. Judge Aris…)
Gaelan
> On Feb 12, 2019, at 1:09 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
>
> I intend with 2 days’ notice to deputise for Prime Minister to appoint a
> Speaker from among the laureled
6 matches
Mail list logo
