Ah, alright.
Gaelan
> On Dec 2, 2018, at 6:00 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> Pardon me - If you had not submitted that vote, Jacob Arduino's vote would
> have resolved to AGAINST, not PRESENT. Either way your vote evaluates to
> ENDORSE V.J. Rada.
>
> -twg
>
>
> ‐‐‐ Original Message
Pardon me - If you had not submitted that vote, Jacob Arduino's vote would have
resolved to AGAINST, not PRESENT. Either way your vote evaluates to ENDORSE
V.J. Rada.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, December 3, 2018 1:56 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> You ENDORSEd the person
You ENDORSEd the person who would _otherwise_ be the last person to vote FOR,
i.e., who would be the last person to vote FOR in the hypothetical scenario
that you had not submitted that vote. If you had not submitted that vote, Jacob
Arduino's vote endorsing you would have resolved to PRESENT, s
Did I really vote FOR 8136? IIRC I ENDORSED the last person to vote FOR, and
someone else did as well (that may have been Jacob, who changed eir vote to
endorse me). Either way, I *think* that’s an inextricable conditional that
resolves to PRESENT.
> On Dec 2, 2018, at 3:51 PM, Timon Walshe-Gre
> On Dec 2, 2018, at 8:05 PM, ATMunn wrote:
>
> CFJ 3690, that is.
>
>> On 12/2/2018 8:04 PM, ATMunn wrote:
>> What message thread was CFJ 2690 called under?
Here is the CFJ Email thread:
Cfj
> -- Forwarded message -
> From: Timon Walshe-Grey
> Date: Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 7:
CFJ 3690, that is.
On 12/2/2018 8:04 PM, ATMunn wrote:
What message thread was CFJ 2690 called under?
On 12/2/2018 8:02 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018, twg wrote:
CFJ: "G. possesses at least one blot."
This is CFJ 3690. I assign it to ATMunn.
On Sun, 2 Dec 2018, Jacob Ardui
What message thread was CFJ 2690 called under?
On 12/2/2018 8:02 PM, D. Margaux wrote:
On Fri, Nov 30, 2018, twg wrote:
CFJ: "G. possesses at least one blot."
This is CFJ 3690. I assign it to ATMunn.
On Sun, 2 Dec 2018, Jacob Arduino wrote:
CFJ: "the last person to vote FOR a proposal"
I create 5 coins in my possession for publishing the most recent Treasuror
weekly report.
I create 5 coins in my possession for publishing the most recent Tailor monthly
report.
I create 5 coins in my possession for publishing the most recent Referee weekly
report.
I act on behalf of Tenhigitsu
This fails, as do Aris' and ATMunn's attempts to change their votes, because
the voting periods for these proposals ended at 10:35pm.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Sunday, December 2, 2018 10:39 PM, Edward Murphy wrote:
> > 8133 Trigon 1.0 Proposals aren't worth that much
> FOR
>
>
On Sun, 2 Dec 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Wait, how should I vote? I saw some conditional weirdness, but didn’t read
> through it.
8138 is missing a critical "by announcement" therefore broken (if it
passes, it just keeps the status quo because the new functionality is
all that's broken there
On Sun, 2 Dec 2018, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Dec 2018, D. Margaux wrote:
>
> > Does that actually work though?
> >
> > I don’t see any provision that resets the resale value to 2 after the master
> > switch is set back to the player. So I think nichdel’s resale value is still
> > 1, b
Wait, how should I vote? I saw some conditional weirdness, but didn’t read
through it.
-Aris
On Sun, Dec 2, 2018 at 4:45 AM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> Oh dear, someone's not been paying attention. :P
>
> Just to make sure it doesn't actually pass, I change my vote on Proposal
> 8138 to AGAINST,
On Sun, 2 Dec 2018, D. Margaux wrote:
Does that actually work though?
I don’t see any provision that resets the resale value to 2 after the
master switch is set back to the player. So I think nichdel’s resale
value is still 1, because eir master switch was previously transferred
to me.
Res
Does that actually work though?
I don’t see any provision that resets the resale value to 2 after the master
switch is set back to the player. So I think nichdel’s resale value is still 1,
because eir master switch was previously transferred to me.
Next time nichdel is resold, eir resale value
On Sun, 2 Dec 2018, ATMunn wrote:
> On 12/2/2018 1:07 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > CoE: it is self-comtradictory to list Nichdel as a zombie if eir
> > master switch is emself - e is not a zombie and has no resale value.
>
> Right. I'm a derp. I accept this CoE and publish the following revision
Derp. I was reading it upside down
> On Dec 2, 2018, at 10:38 AM, ATMunn wrote:
>
> It's in there?
>
>> On 12/2/2018 1:08 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>> Also, this doesn’t ratify, but it’s missing in the events section.
>>> On Dec 2, 2018, at 6:55 AM, ATMunn wrote:
>>>
>>> On 12/1/2018 3:06 PM,
It's in there?
On 12/2/2018 1:08 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
Also, this doesn’t ratify, but it’s missing in the events section.
On Dec 2, 2018, at 6:55 AM, ATMunn wrote:
On 12/1/2018 3:06 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
CoE: My nichdel shenanigans are missing.
I accept this CoE and publish the foll
Comments inline
Gaelan
> On Dec 2, 2018, at 5:11 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
> Figured I'd pick this up and run with it since ATMunn said e lost interest. I
> mainly just looked over other issues people pointed out and fixed them, as
> well as rearranging a few other things, but unfortunat
Also, this doesn’t ratify, but it’s missing in the events section.
> On Dec 2, 2018, at 6:55 AM, ATMunn wrote:
>
> On 12/1/2018 3:06 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>> CoE: My nichdel shenanigans are missing.
>
> I accept this CoE and publish the following revision:
>
> --
On Sun, 2 Dec 2018, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
Enact a new rule entitled "The Astronomor", with power 1.0 and the
following text:
{
The Astronomor is an office. The Astronomor's weekly report
includes, in addition to any information required by other rules,
a list of all Sectors and their
Hey, thanks for taking this up. I had assumed everybody had forgotten
about it. This certainly is much nicer than anything else I could ever do.
On 12/2/2018 8:11 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
Figured I'd pick this up and run with it since ATMunn said e lost interest. I
mainly just looked over
Figured I'd pick this up and run with it since ATMunn said e lost interest. I
mainly just looked over other issues people pointed out and fixed them, as well
as rearranging a few other things, but unfortunately I forgot to keep a note of
each thing I modified so there's no changelog. Still, I th
22 matches
Mail list logo
