so basically this is super clunky and probably not going to work, but if
you think there's any hope for it then please say so :)
Title: "spaaace?"
AI: 1
Author: ATMunn
Co-author(s): Aris
Enact a new rule entitled "Spaceships", with the following text:
{
Spaceships are indestructible fixed as
On the other hand, there is this reasoning by Aris from a prior email chain
that may be persuasive for why this kind of objection may be valid:
https://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg29565.html
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 8:18 PM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
> CFJ, barring G.:
Ok folks, first of all, this is *quite* suspicious, so it's worth our
time to hunt down which one twg is worried about.
Secondly, there is a standing precedent for this working - I'll dig
it up later, but the point is - no effort required - no one is
required to look anything up until someone a
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-10-15 at 16:43 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > I object to all intents to perform actions without N objections
> > (for all values of N) that have been announced by people other
> > than myself in the last 14 days.
>
> I think it'd probably
On Mon, 2018-10-15 at 16:43 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I object to all intents to perform actions without N objections
> (for all values of N) that have been announced by people other
> than myself in the last 14 days.
I think it'd probably be a good idea to require announcements of intent
to b
I don't exactly see how I'm a coauthor, but I won't complain :P
On 10/15/2018 1:23 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Oops, meant to add ATMunn here.
I remove my proposal, The Middle Way, from the proposal pool.
I submit the following proposal, The Middle Way, AI-1, coauthor ATMunn.
I pend it.
No scam in this one. This was the culmination of the discussion thread
about what CFJs were needed after the Round Robin confusion. I suggested
one judge because the issues are very intermingled. (Can’t be me because I
called the CFJs.)
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 5:10 PM Timon Walshe-Grey wrote:
>
(Unofficial - I don't believe it's actually possible to submit an official
apology until after the Referee has imposed the Cold Hand of Justice (if,
indeed, a Finger is Pointed at all). Though I could be wrong?)
I'm sorry I missed the Treasuror report last week (and, to a lesser extent, the
Hum
Hmm. For some reason this feels like a build-up to a scam. Oh well, let's see
what happens.
-twg
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Monday, October 15, 2018 7:24 PM, D Margaux wrote:
> I CFJ the following three statements, and suggest to the Arbitor that they
> should probably be assigned t
I was also thinking 7 was too high, but 3 is too low - it's basically
noise in the way people go up and down. How's 5?
On Sun, 14 Oct 2018, Aris Merchant wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 14, 2018 at 9:55 PM Reuben Staley
> wrote:
>
> > I vote as follows:
> >
> > On 10/14/2018 06:06 PM, Aris Merchant wro
10 matches
Mail list logo
