On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, Aris Merchant wrote:
Do you want this distributed with this weeks distributions?
That's a still buggy version, so probably not.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
-Aris
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
Ugh, I missed a pledge, and I’m not sure that retroactive cre
I have, see "Resolving elections: Correctly this time".
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
> Accepting this does nothing without republishing a revised version.
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
> p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
>
>
>
>> On Sep 21,
Do you want this distributed with this weeks distributions?
-Aris
On Thu, Sep 14, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> Ugh, I missed a pledge, and I’m not sure that retroactive creation would
> work. I withdraw the proposal “Make Your Home Shine” and submit the following
> proposal in its p
When I submit this proposal, they will be removed.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 21, 2017, at 2:50 PM, Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>
> I have trouble with the plusses and minuses. It means that I'm not
> allowed to wrap lines in my promotor repor
I have trouble with the plusses and minuses. It means that I'm not
allowed to wrap lines in my promotor report, something I usually do on
a fairly regular basis.
-Aris
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 9:57 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
wrote:
> In response to feedback, here is the new banking propo
Welcome to Agora! I hope you enjoy it here.
-Aris
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 6:35 AM, ATMunn . wrote:
> Hey! I'm ATMunn.
> I discovered Agora a little while back, and just decided it sounded
> interesting, so I joined.
>
> I've seen some of the messages that have been so far, and honestly I have no
In response to feedback, here is the new banking proposal, if I don't get
negative feedback, I plan to pend it this week:
{
All "+" and "-" symbols in the body of this proposal should be ignored and
shall have no effect on the ruleset or game state.
Replace the following line in "Assets":
- res
I like and use Discord, but I'd take IRC any day over Discord.
Still, I wouldn't oppose the idea of using both.
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:15 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I strongly oppose this, because the benefit of IRC is the ability
There's a CFJ to the effect of "unless it's explicitly written in an Instrument
of power,
loops and paradoxes are just thrown out altogether as being ambiguous as per
needing
to specify actions clearly (R478). If there's an explicit rule/instrument that
sets it up
and takes precedence over ot
I could write an Agency with that same thing + output, for example,
something like:
---*---
Any agent may take 1 shiny from Cuddlebeam and the following clause has no
effect.
Any agent may take 2 shiny from Cuddlebeam and the previous clause has no
effect.
---*---
Then summon a CFJ for if someon
I strongly oppose this, because the benefit of IRC is the ability for each user
to choose their client.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 21, 2017, at 11:14 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
>
> Maybe we could switch to Slack/Discord.
>
> On Thu, Sep 21,
Maybe we could switch to Slack/Discord.
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus <
p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> When I am on my computer, I am normally logged in, but while I am on, I
> have seen little activity.
>
> Publius Scribonius Scholastic
Interesting question.
I'd say it does have the potential to break things, but that it's a known
feature.
i.e. if we put something broken in a Rule via a proposal, then we'd have
to say "it's our fault, we shouldn't have voted for it." It's really the
same (only) protection against bad proposal
I agree with these suggestions.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 21, 2017, at 10:32 AM, grok (caleb vines) wrote:
>
> Monthly ratification would be a positive step. Maybe increasing the
> window of self-ratification for Registrar reports only. M
On Sep 20, 2017, at 2:38 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> Without addressing the question of whether a proposal can have direct effects
> on other proposals without enacting a rule change (a complicated question
> under rule 2140), it seems clear that a proposal can have effects beyond rule
> change
Monthly ratification would be a positive step. Maybe increasing the
window of self-ratification for Registrar reports only. Maybe both in
combination.
-grok
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 9:24 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> It occurs to me that (thinking back over a couple years), several registration
It occurs to me that (thinking back over a couple years), several registration
errors have been ratified, and given that this kicks people out of the game,
it's a fairly big error that can lead to anger. Also changes in registration
are infrequent enough that a weekly reset isn't needed, it's n
When I am on my computer, I am normally logged in, but while I am on, I have
seen little activity.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 21, 2017, at 10:07 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> Welcome ATMunn!
>
> I haven't been to the IRC channel in qu
Welcome ATMunn!
I haven't been to the IRC channel in quite a while, are people still using it
much?
I enjoyed doing so but activity died down there over a year ago so I stopped
checking.
-G.
On Thu, 21 Sep 2017, ATMunn . wrote:
> Hey! I'm ATMunn.
> I discovered Agora a little while back, and
No one made any campaign or supporting/opposing speeches during the election,
at least not that I saw? This is key to any election that's actually
contested. Reading your vote, it seemed like a general preference against
incumbency, but not as if you had any direct reason to protest against PS
Welcome Atmunn!
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:35 PM, ATMunn . wrote:
> Hey! I'm ATMunn.
> I discovered Agora a little while back, and just decided it sounded
> interesting, so I joined.
>
> I've seen some of the messages that have been so far, and honestly I have
> no idea what's going on, or what t
I'd like to remind you that I apologized and did not intend to make that error,
having believed that I had corrected it. Also, I would like to specify that my
methods for doing the report have changed hopefully reducing error.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.c
Hey! I'm ATMunn.
I discovered Agora a little while back, and just decided it sounded
interesting, so I joined.
I've seen some of the messages that have been so far, and honestly I have
no idea what's going on, or what to do. :P
But it seems like there's a really friendly community here, so I'm sur
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:45 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
> Registrar
> This result has changed. Nichdel had three first-preference votes, but
> PSS had six and remains registrar. This resolver disagrees with the
> result. Anyway.
Either people forgot that PSS attempted to deregister me by
ratific
Accepting this does nothing without republishing a revised version.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 21, 2017, at 2:56 AM, VJ Rada wrote:
>
> Re-accepting.
>
> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:10 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>>
>> Re-CoEing.
>>
>> O
25 matches
Mail list logo
