Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Appeal resolution for CFJ 3534

2017-07-07 Thread Alex Smith
On Fri, 2017-07-07 at 20:52 -0400, omd wrote: > On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Alex Smith > wrote: > > omd: unresolvable conditional, default PRESENT > > [note: omd's conditional depends on the correctness of the > > judgement; given that the judgement reasoning is being remanded, > > there's no

DIS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] Appeal resolution for CFJ 3534

2017-07-07 Thread omd
On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Alex Smith wrote: > omd: unresolvable conditional, default PRESENT > [note: omd's conditional depends on the correctness of the judgement; > given that the judgement reasoning is being remanded, there's no > Agoran-legal reason to conclude any particular correctnes

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3538 assigned to omd

2017-07-07 Thread V.J Rada
Let's amend that rule to avoid promises being conatured this way, yeah? On Friday, July 7, 2017, Quazie wrote: > On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 09:40 omd > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 6:25 PM, Alex Smith > > wrote: >> >> > 1. Pledge and promise are synonyms in ordinary meaning. >> >> > Does tha

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3538 assigned to omd

2017-07-07 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Fri, 7 Jul 2017, Quazie wrote: I point my finger at omd for breaking rule 478 by temporarily, and accidently, taking down the mailing lists on or around the 21st of June. I recommend a Green Card as I am just testing eir open question in the above judgement That would be more than 14 days

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3538 assigned to omd

2017-07-07 Thread Cuddle Beam
Damn that sounds so cool. I request all of the info you may give me regarding scams like those, I'd appreciate it so much. On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 6:40 PM, omd wrote: > > Yes. The rules don't exist in a bubble: they can pay attention to > whatever aspects of the 'real world' they want to. Most r

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: CFJ 3537 assigned to V.J. Rada

2017-07-07 Thread V.J Rada
Oh blimey. I might just keep my judgement in place and add an explanatory note later. Unless anyone wants to support the moot. One more for that. On Thursday, July 6, 2017, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > NttPF. > > Greetings, > Ørjan. > > On Thu, 6 Jul 2017, V.J Rada wrote: > > I move reconsideration.

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Surveyor] [Probably] Weekly Report

2017-07-07 Thread Cuddle Beam
Ah. Thank you. Fixed. Again, credit to Owen for the main report content. On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Just to note, no content is included in this message. > > Publius Scribonius Scholasticus > p.scribon

DIS: Re: OFF: [Surveyor] [Probably] Weekly Report

2017-07-07 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
Just to note, no content is included in this message. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Jul 7, 2017, at 4:26 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > ... And if I am the Surveyor, then I publish that weekly report, because in > that case it would be my duty. > >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: [CFJ] Surveyor

2017-07-07 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
I agree that an action is required to occult, I just don't believe that a check is a required action. In my mind, I was thinking of the time as part of the required state. On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 01:06 Owen Jacobson wrote: > > On Jul 6, 2017, at 6:46 AM, Alex Smith wrote: > > On Thu, 2017-07-06 a