I'm convinced that assets are needed in order for the economy to
progress. I'm going to re-propose them, given that the CFJ has been
sorted out. First, I'd like to know if anyone has any minor changes
that would make the proposal less objectionable to them.
-Aris
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 10:33 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> Many voting scams in the past have end up in a race condition,
> dependent on voting on the last minute. Here's a proto to address
> that in general (and maybe even make it an interesting endgame).
>
> Just phrased generally to get feed
Random question: Is there a way to formalize the fact that I do not want my
name (as opposed to y nickname) to be an acceptable way to refer to me?
天火狐
Many voting scams in the past have end up in a race condition,
dependent on voting on the last minute. Here's a proto to address
that in general (and maybe even make it an interesting endgame).
Just phrased generally to get feedback, need to figure out which rules
it needs to overrule, etc.
On Sun, 14 May 2017, tmanthe2nd . wrote:
> I understand that, I just don't understand what's going on in this case,
> and I thought the voting had already ended.
The loophole ais523 found was that anyone can "withdraw" anyone else's
vote. You can only cast your own vote, but ais523 found that
I understand that, I just don't understand what's going on in this case,
and I thought the voting had already ended.
On Sunday, May 14, 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-05-14 at 19:13 -0700, tmanthe2nd . wrote:
> > What is going on with all these votes?
>
> In general, one of the main acti
On Sun, 2017-05-14 at 19:13 -0700, tmanthe2nd . wrote:
> What is going on with all these votes?
In general, one of the main activities of the game is voting on
proposals to change the rules. Agora's a game where the rules can be
changed by its players, and we tend to do that a lot.
In specific, o
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 7:34 PM, Jonathan Rouillard
wrote:
> On Sun, May 7, 2017 at 4:03 AM Aris Merchant
> wrote:
>> ID Author(s) AI Title Pender Pend fee (sh.)
>> -
>> 7849+ Aris 3.0 Scam
What is going on with all these votes?
On Mon, 15 May 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-05-14 at 18:21 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 14 May 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> > > For each ballot on the Agoran Decision on whether to adopt proposal
> > > 7851, if that ballot was not submitted by ais523, Josh T, o, or Quazie,
>
On Sun, 2017-05-14 at 18:21 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Sun, 14 May 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> > For each ballot on the Agoran Decision on whether to adopt proposal
> > 7851, if that ballot was not submitted by ais523, Josh T, o, or Quazie,
> > I withdraw that ballot.
>
> FWIW, 7851 would hav
On Sun, 14 May 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> For each ballot on the Agoran Decision on whether to adopt proposal
> 7851, if that ballot was not submitted by ais523, Josh T, o, or Quazie,
> I withdraw that ballot.
FWIW, 7851 would have no effect on the ruleset, as it doesn't specify
the order of nece
The Coe will not affect passing - if it's correct it's another vote for.
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 16:44 Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-05-14 at 16:38 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > By the way, I'd welcome technical arguments about the timing from
> > other players. I'm afraid I don't have the
On Sun, 2017-05-14 at 16:38 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> By the way, I'd welcome technical arguments about the timing from
> other players. I'm afraid I don't have the technical expertise needed
> to interpret the headers in a meaningful way. Also, proposal 7848
> passed, which creates an addition
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-05-14 at 16:26 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
>> What about quorum? See CFJ 1562, which indicates that canceled votes
>> do not count towards quorum. Also Rule 683 "A valid ballot is a
>> ballot, correctly submitted, that has not been
On Sun, 2017-05-14 at 16:26 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> What about quorum? See CFJ 1562, which indicates that canceled votes
> do not count towards quorum. Also Rule 683 "A valid ballot is a
> ballot, correctly submitted, that has not been withdrawn." and Rule
> 955 "If there is more than one opt
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-05-07 at 15:56 -0700, qoid.us (Agora's list server) wrote:
>> Received: (qmail 13401 invoked from network); 7 May 2017 22:56:48 -
>> Received: from localhost (HELO vps.qoid.us) (127.0.0.1)
>> by vps.qoid.us with SMTP; 7 May 20
1... 2... 3...
-Aris
Admittedly I missed that. But I think ballots have to explicitly be
withdrawn before new ones are valid.
On May 14, 2017 01:55, "Quazie" wrote:
> Claim of error - my email entitled 'votes' should've superseded my vote on
> this proposal I believe.
>
> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 05:38 nichdel wrote
19 matches
Mail list logo
