On Sun, 23 Oct 2016, Aris Merchant wrote:
> (See American Bar Association model code of judicial conduct...)
Sorry, Your Honor, I was on the wrong continent. (where's that Map
of Agora when you need it...)
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 9:26 PM, ais523
wrote:
>
> If you follow the guidelines used by the construction rules used for
> the rest of Spivak, I guess the appropriate gender-neutral, sentience-
> neutral title would be "Messr.".
Duly noted. I didn't know that Spivak extended that far. I was assu
On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 21:15 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Very well, Mr. (Used by standard english sarcastic convention) Humble
> Scribe of the Court.
If you follow the guidelines used by the construction rules used for
the rest of Spivak, I guess the appropriate gender-neutral, sentience-
neutral
On Sunday, October 23, 2016, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> Milud, if I may say so with respect as the Humble Scribe of the Court,
> Milud, it is not atypical (that is, it sometimes happens, Milud) that a
> person makes judicial arguments that include an assertion that "this
> argument shows that somethi
Aris wrote:
> I support the quoted intention.
Alexis wrote:
> I support and do so.
I am honored by your Support and promise to be a Speaker
for *all* Agorans.
On Sun, 23 Oct 2016, Aris Merchant wrote:
> 2. E has attempted to create a proposal, not only during an open case,
> but IN EIR ARGUMENTS. By doing so, e has shown insufficient respect for
> these proceedings. E is expected to limit eir arguments to matters
> related to the case, and to refrai
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, ais523 wrote:
> Incidentally, anyone feel worthy of the Speaker role? AFAIR, nobody's
> won recently and as such it's mostly up for grabs. I'd be willing to
> appoint someone else into the position, if they make a viable pitch.
I would like the promotion to figurehead. My
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 11:13 PM ais523
wrote:
> On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 22:53 +0200, Luis Ressel wrote:
> > I initiate an election for the ADoP.
> >
> > I initiate an Agoran decision to determine the new ADoP. For this
> > decision, the vote collector is the ADoP and the valid options are the
> >
On Sun, 23 Oct 2016, Luis Ressel wrote:
> I vote [aranea, G.]. If anyone makes a compelling case why e should be
> Prime Minister, I will add them in front of my current vote list.
I think I should be term-limited out of this one. (and saving my vote
for now :) ). -G.
On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> Arguments intermixed with quoted text.
Oh, that's right, the other thing I had meant to do on case
assignment is go back and include your previous arguments;
apologies for not doing so, your response here will be added
as gratuitous arguments in the cas
On Sun, 2016-10-23 at 18:39 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> By the way, if you find areana failed in eir duty, it's ok to extend
> your
> arguments to the further question of Alexis's scam versus my counter-
> scam. While you can't opine officially, if your arguments are persuasive,
> we've been kno
On Sun, 23 Oct 2016, Aris Merchant wrote:
> (Blushes) Oops again. I checked the ADoP's report this time, honest, but I
> think I miss-read it. Sorry. I'd thought it was...
> Someone who hadn't been that active lately. Sorry, if I'd known it was you I
> just would have left it. Just curious, why
(Blushes) Oops again. I checked the ADoP's report this time, honest, but I
think I miss-read it. Sorry. I'd thought it was... Someone who hadn't been
that active lately. Sorry, if I'd known it was you I just would have left
it. Just curious, why didn't you assign it sooner?
-Aris
On Sunday, October 23, 2016, Alexis Hunt wrote:
>
> If my proposal gets distributed, I won't have a reason to continue trying
> to hold ADoP. Though I should add that my general inclination is not to fix
> things with ratification.
>
> -Alexis
>
You'll be seeing my solution to this whole buisness
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 8:17 PM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Sunday, October 23, 2016, Alexis Hunt wrote:
>
>
> I object, because ratifying that would ruin my scam (if it indeed
> succeeded).
>
> -Alexis
>
> How are we going to deal with this then? Have ever
On Sunday, October 23, 2016, Alexis Hunt wrote:
>
>
> I object, because ratifying that would ruin my scam (if it indeed
> succeeded).
>
> -Alexis
>
How are we going to deal with this then? Have everyone approve everything?
We need to get this CFJ over with.
-Aris
On Sun, 23 Oct 2016 23:13:43 +0200
Luis Ressel wrote:
> I vote [aranea, G.]. If anyone makes a compelling case why e should be
> Prime Minister, I will add them in front of my current vote list.
Nothing good comes of it when I try to use the Spivak pronouns. Please
excuse the inconsistency :)
-
On Sat, 22 Oct 2016 23:50:33 +0100
ais523 wrote:
> On Sat, 2016-10-22 at 12:10 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > Other note: A fair thing to do would be to hold an election. But
> > election for ADoP is resolved by ADoP - a problem! We actually
> > used to have "separation of powers" for this, s
On Sat, Oct 22, 2016 at 3:50 PM, ais523 > wrote:
>
> This kind-of implies it should be the Promotor who resolves an ADoP
> election, except that that doesn't really make logical sense. Perhaps
> it should be resolved by the Assessor (who's already used to resolving
> elections), or by the Prime Mi
On Thursday, October 20, 2016, Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Thursday, October 20, 2016, Kerim Aydin > wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I'll see how it looks for the next report, though if anyone wants to do
>> it for themselves (to choose the order and grammar) I'll take t
20 matches
Mail list logo
