> On Sep 15, 2016, at 12:35 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>> Has anyone written (and maintained, which is the real work) a
>> concordance for Agora’s rules, so that players can more easily
>> cross-reference terms?
>
> There have been a couple in the
> On Sep 15, 2016, at 1:22 PM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
>
> Proposal: Agencies (AI=3)
> {{{
> c) If the action is to be performed With T Notice, if the itent was
> announced at
> least T earlier.
Typo: “intent"
> Enact a new power-1 rule entitled "TLAs" that reads as follows:
>
On Sep 15, 2016, at 12:58 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I'm vaguely remembering a precedent that said "an announcement clearly
> for one thing is not to be interpreted as an announcement for something
> else".
>
> For example, it's pretty clear that people reply to a Proposal
> distribution with a si
On Thu, 2016-09-15 at 09:58 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I'm vaguely remembering a precedent that said "an announcement clearly
> for one thing is not to be interpreted as an announcement for something
> else".
>
> For example, it's pretty clear that people reply to a Proposal
> distribution with
On Thu, 2016-09-15 at 09:30 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> This might be a bit finicky as it's not always clear what "inoperative"
> means. In general, if a rule uses a term, but that term ceases to be
> defined, it falls back on common definitions (if any).
You don't have to go back in history for
Lets find some and point out what we like and don't like about them, and
their differences.
The ones G found:
=
SEPTEMBER 2010
Rule 2166/15 (Power=2)
Assets
An asset is an entity defined as such by a rule or contest
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:48 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Detail: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/3461
>
> = CFJ 3461 =
>
> I voted PRESENT on proposal 7809.
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Aris Merchant wrote:
> I'm not trying to take credit for any of that. It's all blatantly stolen.
> I was just trying to flesh out the outline of what to do
> with G's ideas.
Don't worry about this; we all blatantly borrow and what I took was old and
not mine. If you think
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> What’s the protocol here? Resubmit with (A) a fixed Subject: header and (B)
> AI=3?
Don't worry about subject header; just retract and then propose anew
(can have the same name, but a courtesy is to add a "v2" or similar
for clarity).
For everyone
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:48 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Detail: https://faculty.washington.edu/kerim/nomic/cases/3461
>
> = CFJ 3461 =
>
> I voted PRESENT on proposal 7809.
>
> ==
On Thu, 2016-09-15 at 00:59 -0400, Owen Jacobson wrote:
> Re-reading rule 106 suggests that the power of the proposed or
> amended rule is the minimum AI for the proposal, is this the only
> condition I missed last time around?
You're missing rule 2140, which is really the heart of the Power
syste
11 matches
Mail list logo
