On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, 14 Aug 2016, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
>> On Sun, 14 Aug 2016, David Nicol wrote:
>>
>> > Daydreaming here about trying to leverage my involvement with this
>> > game (since its inception!) into a non-frivolous claim that I am "a
>> >
On Tue, 16 Aug 2016, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2016, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > On Sun, 14 Aug 2016, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> >
> > Elder Lurker is in fact a held and official Patent Title.
> >
> > Probably a title Chuck should get after chiming in on Fri :_)
>
> *Feels slightly miffed
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
Elder Lurker is in fact a held and official Patent Title.
Probably a title Chuck should get after chiming in on Fri :_)
*Feels slightly miffed*
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 12:07 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Aug 2016, ais523 wrote:
> > (I leave it to the rest of Agora to guess whether this proposal is a
> > simple incremental improvement to the ruleset, or a veiled threat.)
>
> I consider every one of your proposals to be a veiled t
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016, ais523 wrote:
> I wouldn't be opposed to an s/player/person/ here, but currently
> winning is only defined for players (thus you'd have to change more
> rules).
Actually I'm not so sure. Rule 2449 states what happens when a Player
wins the game, but *doesn't* state what hap
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016, ais523 wrote:
> (I leave it to the rest of Agora to guess whether this proposal is a
> simple incremental improvement to the ruleset, or a veiled threat.)
I consider every one of your proposals to be a veiled threat.
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016, nichdel wrote:
> I also think that we don't want to let the conditions for historied (as
> in multiple winners) titles slip in meaning too much.
Interesting to mention "winners" in this regard; the categories of Champion
in the Herald's Report are about 50-75% informal, reco
On 08/15/2016 11:17 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> Now, of course, we've got the "generic" method by which any title
> (including the above) can be awarded with the right level of Support.
> This came about, in part, with the start of the trend (~2004?) to award
> arbitrary Patent Titles via scam prop
In the past, we've had specified Patent Titles in the Rules that could
be earned through various mechanisms in the now-repealed Rule 1922.
Examples: Bard (earned if you displayed online poetry or other
"performance" level creative wit). Filthy Bureaucrat (to be awarded to
anyone who is simu
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Aug 2016, David Nicol wrote:
>
> > Daydreaming here about trying to leverage my involvement with this
> > game (since its inception!) into a non-frivolous claim that I am "a
> > member in good standing" of something. Am I still a registered
10 matches
Mail list logo
