On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 06:39 -0700, Edward Murphy wrote:
> For the record, this dates back to the IADoP report of 2014-10-15, and
> was equally vague back then. A quick scan of a-b around that same time
> turns up an attempted scam involving the office, but nothing obviously
> suggesting that Rule 2
ais523 wrote:
On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 05:17 -0700, Edward Murphy wrote:
~ May not exist (reason unknown)
If we had a working criminal justice system, I'd consider crimming you
for excessive vagueness here. (I'd identify the violated rule as 2143,
and conveniently neglect to identify which par
On Sat, 2015-03-28 at 05:17 -0700, Edward Murphy wrote:
> ~ May not exist (reason unknown)
If we had a working criminal justice system, I'd consider crimming you
for excessive vagueness here. (I'd identify the violated rule as 2143,
and conveniently neglect to identify which paragraph.)
Part of
I think I'll try to work out a new draft of the proposal on Organizations
then.
That is, unless someone thinks I better can spend time on an older draft?
stadjer
2015-03-26 20:38 GMT+01:00 Kerim Aydin :
>
>
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2015, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 6:12 AM, stad
4 matches
Mail list logo
