On 04/21/2014 12:26 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
AGAINST. Under current rule allowing vacancy grabbing, makes for
trivial wins with a race.
Worse, it's possible to win arbitrarily many times in the same message.
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014, omd wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Sean Hunt
> wrote:
> > Proposal: Relative Months (AI=2)
>
> AGAINST. Just say 30 days.
As a recordkeepor, I like the fact that the addition of some
admittedly slightly-complex Rules language makes tracking the
time period mu
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 4:23 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Proposal: Relative Months (AI=2)
AGAINST. Just say 30 days.
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I don't think there's precedent for this interpretation here, normally if we
> say "the last week" or "the last 7 days" or such,
> we go by real time, not "the previous Agoran week" or "the previous 7 Agoran
> days".
This interpretation is hampered by t
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 1:26 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> I vote:
>
> > Num Author AI Title
> > 7632 scshunt 3 All Activity is Good Activity
> AGAINST.
> Bug: If someone registers for the first time in April, can I
> deregister them instantly because they didn't post something in
5 matches
Mail list logo
