On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Nicholas Evans wrote:
> Otherwise, I see no reason that a dog-machine combination shouldn't be
> allowed to play, though I doubt they would do much.
We really need a quote book... :)
On Fri, 2014-02-14 at 15:59 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I transfer an 'i' to Lilly.
>
> (This is actually non-controversial; operator ownership isn't limited to
> players or persons).
Isn't it slightly controversial, in that there's currently no proof
generally available to Agorans that Lilly exi
On 2/12/2014 12:46 PM, omd wrote:
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Nich Del Evans wrote:
I
also agree that they can imitate recursion to an even more limited extent.
Well, if a computer program can manage to parse a deeply nested
sentence, I expect it could proceed to manipulate it with far m
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, omd wrote:
> Yep! But it matters if I submit her as a co-author for a proposal, as
> it determines whether the Promotor and Rulekeepor must mention her, so
> there. (Of course that's arguably UNDETERMINED since I have not
> provided any proof that she exists...)
Huh. Is c
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> Let's say a human started sending messages to the board in a language
> that no-one else here recognized, or said "this is an obscure dialect
> of Navajo" but didn't offer any other translations. At least one CFJ
> found that this would fail t
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> Thanks for the confidence, but not now. Ask me again in two months,
> when the theatre group I'm in has finished this year's production.
Break a leg!!
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, omd wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > I think that there's a past precedent or two it's important to consider
> > whom you can communicate to as part of "communication". For example,
> > code or slang (AGAINT) is only communication if the "Rea
On 14 February 2014 18:37, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Now that things are really picking up, I'd love it if someone
> out there would be willing to do Promotor so I can keep the
> Herald's game and CFJs up to date.
>
> I don't mind being assessor but if someone wants that, more than
> happy to give
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I think that there's a past precedent or two it's important to consider
> whom you can communicate to as part of "communication". For example,
> code or slang (AGAINT) is only communication if the "Reasonable Agoran"
> (or if things have to be
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014, Alex Smith wrote:
> So I'd say that Lilly's communication is not capable of communicating
> anything that's outside the experience of the human or other entity e's
> communicating with. There's something lacking in this sort of
> communication that seems to fail to meet the s
On 2/13/14, 5:06 , Fool wrote:
>> Even if we were to interpret "win the game" as requiring gameplay to
>> otherwise
>> cease, this action would be beyond the power of the Power-1 Rule 2419. Much
>> of
>> Agora's gameplay is defined at Power > 1 and the rules allowing such gameplay
>> to continue
11 matches
Mail list logo
