On 2014-02-07 7:13 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
It's actually settled law (supported by factual evidence) that the
First Game ended, a new Speaker took the position, and Agora continued.
(it's documented in at least one CFJ; no database up right now so
don't remember which one). -G.
Yes, previous tr
On 2014-02-06 15:28, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Followup: here's my judicial list (combining people standing/sitting
in the old system who have posted since Jan 1 with people so far
expressing interest):
ais523, G., woggle, omd, Tiger, Shredder, Murphy.
(Sprocklem, Nichdel, Yally would be good add
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-02-07 at 04:16 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Alex Smith wrote:
> > >
> > > + 9 2 2 1 0 i
> > >
> > > (Now Philomory has no operators, I have no operators but one 'i', and my
> > > score is 0+92210i.)
> >
> > Opinions soug
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> Except that I see a possible loophole. "Operator" clearly doesn't mean the
> same as operator in math, since people are using digits, even in sequence.
> Which means, what happens if you use _only_ digits as your operators, once
> you've got a positiv
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Alex Smith wrote:
+ 9 2 2 1 0 i
(Now Philomory has no operators, I have no operators but one 'i', and my
score is 0+92210i.)
Opinions sought on game balance: should we implement omd's suggestion
of limiting huge jumps by allowing a
On Fri, 2014-02-07 at 04:16 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Alex Smith wrote:
> >
> > + 9 2 2 1 0 i
> >
> > (Now Philomory has no operators, I have no operators but one 'i', and my
> > score is 0+92210i.)
>
> Opinions sought on game balance: should we implement omd's sugges
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Alex Smith wrote:
>
> + 9 2 2 1 0 i
>
> (Now Philomory has no operators, I have no operators but one 'i', and my
> score is 0+92210i.)
Opinions sought on game balance: should we implement omd's suggestion
of limiting huge jumps by allowing a max of P operators in a given
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Jonatan Kilhamn wrote:
> On 7 February 2014 05:43, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >>
> >> The existence and current interpretation of R104 directly
> >> demonstrates, via a current Rule, that a "game" ended in the
> >> past wh
On 7 February 2014 05:43, Aaron Goldfein wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 10:58 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> The existence and current interpretation of R104 directly
>> demonstrates, via a current Rule, that a "game" ended in the
>> past while Agora continued.
>>
>> (And you thought we
9 matches
Mail list logo
