Re: DIS: Registrar's Report

2013-09-01 Thread Henri Bouchard
Thank you. Sorry for reading over that. -Henri On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 9:15 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Sun, 1 Sep 2013, Henri Bouchard wrote: > >> Is the Registrar's report weekly or monthly? It does not state in the >> Ruleset whether it is weekly or monthly. >> >> -Henri > > > From Rule 214

Re: DIS: Registrar's Report

2013-09-01 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Sun, 1 Sep 2013, Henri Bouchard wrote: Is the Registrar's report weekly or monthly? It does not state in the Ruleset whether it is weekly or monthly. -Henri From Rule 2143: Any information defined by the rules as part of a person's report, without specifying which one, is part

DIS: Registrar's Report

2013-09-01 Thread Henri Bouchard
Is the Registrar's report weekly or monthly? It does not state in the Ruleset whether it is weekly or monthly. -Henri

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Returning Officer] Party Rules

2013-09-01 Thread Fool
I see nothing in the Gerontocracy rule that prevents me from successfully forming a party or otherwise carrying on ordinary Agoran gameplay, although I see how a group of five Elders could choose to step in and make it not happen. Right. Care to explain what I'm overlooking? You have to giv

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Returning Officer] Party Rules

2013-09-01 Thread Joe Stefek
Please forgive my newbness, but I don't see anywhere in the rule(s) about Gerontocracy which prevent the creation of Parties specifically. Within the rule(s) about Gerontocracy, it looks to me like it requires Elder support in order to change the status of entities or decisions, which did not happ

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Returning Officer] Party Rules

2013-09-01 Thread Craig Daniel
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 6:05 PM, Fool wrote: > On 01/09/2013 5:14 PM, Charles Walker wrote: >> >> On 1 September 2013 22:13, Craig Daniel wrote: >>> >>> COE: missing the Ludocratic Party, which formed earlier today. >> >> >> Admitted. > > > CoE^2: no it didn't. Zombie-induced gerontocracy. I see

Re: DIS: Re: OFF: [Returning Officer] The Second Party System

2013-09-01 Thread Charles Walker
On 1 September 2013 22:15, Joe Stefek wrote: > My player name is aperfectring. I would appreciate this being reflected in > future reports. Of course. Noted and corrected in draft.

DIS: Re: OFF: [Returning Officer] The Second Party System

2013-09-01 Thread Joe Stefek
My player name is aperfectring. I would appreciate this being reflected in future reports. --aperfectring On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Charles Walker wrote: > RETURNING OFFICER'S PARTY REPORT > > PARTY MEMBERS > -- > Bestomd, scshunt, ais523

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 3393 assigned to G.

2013-09-01 Thread Charles Walker
On 1 Sep 2013, at 19:34, Kerim Aydin wrote: > On Sun, 1 Sep 2013, Charles Walker wrote: >> On 28 Aug 2013, at 19:37, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 28 Aug 2013, Kerim Aydin wrote: == CFJ 3393 == I violated R

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 3393 assigned to G.

2013-09-01 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Sun, 1 Sep 2013, Charles Walker wrote: > On 28 Aug 2013, at 19:37, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 28 Aug 2013, Kerim Aydin wrote: > >> == CFJ 3393 == > >> > >>I violated Rule 2170 by selecting the nickname "wobble" in

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 3393 assigned to G.

2013-09-01 Thread Charles Walker
On 28 Aug 2013, at 19:37, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Wed, 28 Aug 2013, Kerim Aydin wrote: >> == CFJ 3393 == >> >>I violated Rule 2170 by selecting the nickname "wobble" in ##nomic. >> >> ===