DIS: Re: BUS: Intents to deregister (Pavitra, Kolja, Wooble)

2013-07-26 Thread Sean Hunt
On Jul 26, 2013 4:06 PM, "omd" wrote: > > I intend, without objection, to deregister each of: > Pavitra > Kolja > Wooble > I object re Wooble.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Judgements

2013-07-26 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013, Alex Smith wrote: "received" is what the recent precedents indicate. (The rules require the message to be "sent via" a public forum, rule 478, and it hasn't gone via the forum until both the sender has sent it, and the recipient has received it. Also I can't construct a circ

DIS: Re: BUS: Recent Events

2013-07-26 Thread Charles Walker
On Friday, 26 July 2013, Eric Stucky wrote: > I register. > > > [ -Turiski ] > Welcome!

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Recent Events

2013-07-26 Thread Charles Walker
On Friday, 26 July 2013, Charles Walker wrote: > On Friday, 26 July 2013, Eric Stucky wrote: > >> I register. >> >> >> [ -Turiski ] >> > > Welcome! > Back!

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Judgements

2013-07-26 Thread Alex Smith
On Fri, 2013-07-26 at 23:34 +0200, Ørjan Johansen wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jul 2013, Alex Smith wrote: > > > Finally, CFJ 866 seems to be relevant background reading too (and also > > supports this verdict), and may be responsible for the TDoC confusion > > (in that it holds that the /recipient's/ TDoC

DIS: Re: BUS: Judgements

2013-07-26 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013, Alex Smith wrote: Finally, CFJ 866 seems to be relevant background reading too (and also supports this verdict), and may be responsible for the TDoC confusion (in that it holds that the /recipient's/ TDoC is what matters, not the /sender's/ TDoC). FWIW IMO as the original

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Judgements

2013-07-26 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013, Ørjan Johansen wrote: I would correspondingly find it natural for the TDoC of the sender to be consulted for when a message is _sent_, if the rules were otherwise silent, which however they currently are not (date stamps), albeit in a not very clarifying way. Oh also I s

DIS: Fwd: Bounce action notification

2013-07-26 Thread omd
Hi, I'm the mailing list manager for the Agora Nomic lists. The three recipients of this email have been automatically unsubscribed due to Hotmail rejecting messages for some reason; none of you are players, but if you still wish to receive list mail, let me know. I've filled out a Microsoft for

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 3362 assigned to OscarMeyr

2013-07-26 Thread Benjamin Schultz
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 5:58 PM, Michael Slone wrote: > On 2013-07-25, Benjamin Schultz wrote: > > Aside: As best I can tell, "by announcement" is presently defined in > > R1728/32. I don't see that rule saying the announcement must be ttPF, > but > > I believe this requirement is derived from