http://nomic.zbasu.net/nomicbank/userinfo/murphy/ – replace "murphy" with any
Agoran player's nickname (all lowercase, with punctuation and spaces removed)
to see their accounts. (Parties too!) To indicate that you owe someone
something, punch in a transfer from you to them. When you settle the
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 10:34 PM, Fool wrote:
> Wait... so if I cash something like the "Assurance" promise scshunt recently
> made*, then wouldn't I be guilty of Taunting the Police by Proxy?
>
> *http://www.mail-archive.com/agora-business@agoranomic.org/msg25261.html
Yep.
On 09/07/2013 4:34 PM, omd wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Lindar Greenwood
wrote:
I announce a CFJ on the following text:
{ Announcing in Agora-Business the creation of a promise that, upon
being cashed, causes the player cashing said promise to break a rule,
does not cause the creato
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, Steven Gardner wrote:
> Amend the Rule enacted by Proposal 7490 (Funcentives) by replacing:
>
> Players SHALL NOT discuss eir votes
>
> with:
>
> Players SHALL NOT discuss their votes
>
> }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
On 12 July 2013 09:59, omd wrote:
>
> }{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{}{
>
> Proposal 7520 (AI=3, PF=Y0, Ordinary) by omd
> Grammar fixes
>
> Amend Rule 217 (Interpreting the Rules) by replacing:
>
> Differences in spelling, grammar, capitalization, white
On Thu, 11 Jul 2013, omd wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > I submit the following document with the intent that it become a person,
> > pending agreement of omd (I agree to it): G. and omd agree to disagree.
>
> I think the intent to become a person has to be par
On Jul 11, 2013 3:29 PM, "John Smith" wrote:
>
> I attempt to cause Buckybot to object. This fails if Buckybot is not an
Elder.
>
>
> -Bucky
It also fails if BuckyBot does not exist, as is the case.
-scshunt
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 3:10 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I submit the following document with the intent that it become a person,
> pending agreement of omd (I agree to it): G. and omd agree to disagree.
I think the intent to become a person has to be part of the text :)
On Thu, 2013-07-11 at 12:10 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> I submit the following document with the intent that it become a person,
> pending agreement of omd (I agree to it): G. and omd agree to disagree.
You won't believe how tempted I am to post "I object." right now.
--
ais523
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> If a public agreement exists (Rule 2328), is there currently any Agoran
> mechanism for penalizing breaches in the agreement? [*] I can't find anything
> explicit, but the fact that it can be created as an "agreement" suggests
> that Agora re
There is no explicit prohibition in Agora against violating an agreement, and,
in particular, there is no particular rule that doing so would violate.
Therefore, as far as I can tell, agreements in Agora are not binding.
—Machiavelli
Opinions wanted:
If a public agreement exists (Rule 2328), is there currently any Agoran
mechanism for penalizing breaches in the agreement? [*] I can't find anything
explicit, but the fact that it can be created as an "agreement" suggests
that Agora recognizes it as an agreement, and may hav
12 matches
Mail list logo
